Ellenberg and Venkatesh (2008) proved, via the ergodic theory of pp-adic groups, that a positive definite integral quadratic form QQ on Zn\mathbb{Z}^n represents every locally representable form of squarefree discriminant in m≤n−5m\leq n-5 variables with minimum above an ineffective constant c(Q)c(Q), and every such form in m≤n−3m\leq n-3 variables whose discriminant is prime to a fixed auxiliary odd prime pp, with minimum above an ineffective constant c(Q,p)c(Q,p). They posed four follow-up problems: effectivity of the constants, removal of the auxiliary prime, weakening of the squarefree-discriminant hypothesis, and the codimension-two case n=m+2n=m+2. The first three have since been resolved in the range n−m≥3n-m\geq 3: Schulze-Pillot (2009) replaced the squarefree-discriminant hypothesis by bounded imprimitivity of the local representations, and Einsiedler, Lindenstrauss, Mohammadi and Wieser (2025) proved an effective local-global principle for primitive representations for all n≥m+3n\geq m+3 with no splitting condition, together with effective asymptotics for representation numbers — the Fourier coefficients of Siegel theta series. The surviving open core is codimension two, where the stabilizer of an embedding is a pp-adic torus and unipotent dynamics is unavailable. The conjecture, formalized by Kim, Wieser and Yang (2025): if n−m=2n-m=2 and a form qq is primitively represented by the spin genus of QQ, with minimum large enough in terms of QQ, then qq is primitively represented by QQ. The first case, primitive binary forms by quaternary forms, is a theorem of Kim, Wieser and Yang — but under a splitting condition at two auxiliary primes that the authors call an artifact of their method, and they report no viable analytic approach without it. The problem is to prove the codimension-two local-global principle in general, or refute it.

Background

An integral quadratic lattice is a free Z\mathbb{Z}-module L≃ZnL\simeq\mathbb{Z}^n equipped with an integer-valued positive definite quadratic form QQ. A form qq on Zm\mathbb{Z}^m with m<nm<n is represented by QQ if there is a linear isometry (Zm,q)→(Zn,Q)(\mathbb{Z}^m,q)\to(\mathbb{Z}^n,Q), i.e. an integer matrix XX with XTAQX=AqX^{\mathsf T}A_QX=A_q for Gram matrices AQ,AqA_Q,A_q; the representation is primitive if the image is a primitive (saturated) sublattice of Zn\mathbb{Z}^n. The form qq is locally representable if such an isometry exists over the pp-adic integers Zp\mathbb{Z}_p for every prime pp and over R\mathbb{R}. The genus of QQ is the set of integral forms locally isometric to QQ, so by the Hasse-Minkowski theorem (two rational quadratic forms are isomorphic over Q\mathbb{Q} if and only if they are isomorphic over R\mathbb{R} and over every Qp\mathbb{Q}_p) local representability of qq is equivalent to representation of qq by some form in the genus of QQ. The local-global principle asks when representation by the genus descends to the individual class of QQ.

Between a single class and its genus lies the spin genus: the orbit of the class of QQ under the adelic points of the spin group (the universal cover of the special orthogonal group), i.e. under local transformations of trivial spinor norm (the spinor norm of a product of reflections in vectors viv_i is the product of the values Q(vi)Q(v_i), taken modulo squares, so trivial spinor norm picks out a subgroup of index at most 22 of the local orthogonal group). This is the natural intermediate notion because, when the codimension n−mn-m is at least 33, strong approximation for spin groups (for a simply connected group such as the spin group, adelic points decompose into a single orbit of the integral adelic points away from one place) upgrades local representability to representation by some form in the spin genus. The classical thresholds for the positive definite local-global principle are: high codimension, n≥2m+3n\geq 2m+3 (Hsia, Kitaoka and Kneser 1978, with refinements by Jöchner and Kitaoka), and the first low-codimension case m=1m=1, n=3n=3 — representation of integers by ternary forms — settled by Duke and Schulze-Pillot (1990), necessarily formulated with the spin genus in the hypothesis (the circle method of the 1920s–30s had earlier handled m=1m=1 with n≥4n\geq 4). Ellenberg and Venkatesh (2008) introduced homogeneous dynamics: the embeddings of qq into the genus of QQ form an orbit of the special orthogonal group H=SO⁡n−mH=\operatorname{SO}_{n-m} on an adelic quotient associated to QQ, and for n−m≥3n-m\geq 3 the group HH is semisimple, so measure-classification theorems for unipotent flows (flows generated by nilpotent elements of the group) apply — in the pp-adic setting, Ratner's theorem on products of real and pp-adic groups. Their published theorem: QQ represents every locally representable qq of rank m≤n−5m\leq n-5 and squarefree discriminant with minimum (least nonzero value) at least an ineffective constant c(Q)c(Q); and, for a fixed auxiliary odd prime pp, every such qq of rank m≤n−3m\leq n-3 whose discriminant is prime to pp, with minimum at least an ineffective c(Q,p)c(Q,p) — a Linnik-type splitting condition analogous to the auxiliary prime in Linnik's ergodic method (which exploits the dynamics of a pp-adic rotation group acting on the solutions, and therefore needs a prime at which the form splits; see Ellenberg-Michel-Venkatesh 2010 for a modern account of that method).

In codimension two the mechanism breaks down: the stabilizer of an embedding is SO⁡2(Qp)\operatorname{SO}_2(\mathbb{Q}_p), an abelian torus, on which unipotent dynamics says nothing. Ellenberg and Venkatesh proposed replacing Ratner theory by rigidity of higher-rank diagonalizable (torus) actions: passing from Qp\mathbb{Q}_p to a product of two completions Qp×Qq\mathbb{Q}_p\times\mathbb{Q}_q, the group SO⁡2(Qp)×SO⁡2(Qq)≃Qp××Qq×\operatorname{SO}_2(\mathbb{Q}_p)\times\operatorname{SO}_2(\mathbb{Q}_q)\simeq\mathbb{Q}_p^\times\times\mathbb{Q}_q^\times is a rank-22 torus, the setting of the Einsiedler-Lindenstrauss measure-rigidity program (realized for maximal tori in PGL⁡2\operatorname{PGL}_2-type groups in the Einsiedler-Lindenstrauss-Michel-Venkatesh proof of Duke's theorem for cubic fields). They flagged three obstacles: the needed rigidity statements were then unavailable, positive entropy of the limiting measures must be proven, and concentration of limiting measures on intermediate subgroups must be excluded. The rigidity tool now exists (Einsiedler-Lindenstrauss 2023: classification for higher-rank diagonalizable actions on irreducible quotients of forms of SL⁡2\operatorname{SL}_2, with an adelic version requiring no entropy assumption), and Kim, Wieser and Yang (2025) used it — together with the Siegel mass formula (which computes the average number of representations of qq over a genus as an explicit product of local factors) and determinant-method counting (the technique of Bombieri-Pila and Heath-Brown bounding the number of integral points on algebraic varieties) — to prove the first codimension-two case: primitive binary forms (m=2m=2) by quaternary forms (n=4n=4), primitively represented by the spin genus, with minimum at least C(p1,p2,Q)C(p_1,p_2,Q) and −disc⁡(q)disc⁡(Q)-\operatorname{disc}(q)\operatorname{disc}(Q) a nonzero square modulo two auxiliary odd primes p1,p2p_1,p_2. Meanwhile the other three limitations of the 2008 paper were resolved in codimension ≥3\geq 3: Schulze-Pillot (2009) replaced squarefree discriminant by bounded imprimitivity, and Einsiedler, Lindenstrauss, Mohammadi and Wieser (2025) — building on the effective equidistribution program of Einsiedler-Margulis-Venkatesh (2009), Einsiedler-Margulis-Mohammadi-Venkatesh (2020) and Wieser (2024) — proved an effective local-global principle for primitive representations for all n≥m+3n\geq m+3, with effective constants depending only on the dimension and no splitting condition. What remains open is the codimension-two principle itself, without auxiliary primes, in general rank — the direct generalization of the Duke-Schulze-Pillot theorem from m=1m=1 to m≥2m\geq 2.

Problem Statement

Throughout, QQ is a positive definite integral quadratic form on Zn\mathbb{Z}^n and qq a positive definite integral quadratic form on Zm\mathbb{Z}^m with n=m+2n=m+2 and m≥2m\geq 2; min⁡(q)\min(q) denotes the least nonzero value of qq on Zm∖{0}\mathbb{Z}^m\setminus\{0\}, and disc⁡(⋅)\operatorname{disc}(\cdot) the discriminant (determinant of the Gram matrix of the associated bilinear form, up to the standard factor-of-22 convention). A representation of qq by QQ is an integer matrix XX with XTAQX=AqX^{\mathsf T}A_QX=A_q, i.e. a linear isometry (Zm,q)→(Zn,Q)(\mathbb{Z}^m,q)\to(\mathbb{Z}^n,Q); it is primitive if the image sublattice is primitive (saturated) in Zn\mathbb{Z}^n. The genus of QQ is the set of integral forms locally isometric to QQ (over Zp\mathbb{Z}_p for every prime pp, and over R\mathbb{R}); the spin genus of QQ is the orbit of the class of QQ under local transformations of trivial spinor norm (the spinor norm of a product of reflections in vectors viv_i is the product of the values Q(vi)Q(v_i), modulo squares), an intermediate collection between the single class of QQ and its full genus; and qq is primitively represented by the spin genus of QQ if some form in that collection primitively represents qq.

Main question (the codimension-two local-global principle; Conjecture 1.2 of Kim-Wieser-Yang 2025, formalizing the codimension-two direction left open by Ellenberg-Venkatesh 2008). Prove, or refute: there is a constant c(Q)>0c(Q)>0 such that every qq as above that is primitively represented by the spin genus of QQ and satisfies min⁡(q)≥c(Q)\min(q)\geq c(Q) is primitively represented by QQ itself.

(a) The conjecture has the following variants, each for all m≥2m\geq 2 (all pairs with n−m=2n-m=2): (i) with qq in addition primitive (has coprime coefficients — the setting of Kim-Wieser-Yang's Theorem 1.3); (ii) with the local representations non-primitive, but only by a uniformly bounded index; (iii) the general case, without the splitting condition. For m=1m=1, n=3n=3 the analogous statement is the theorem of Duke-Schulze-Pillot.

(b) The codimension-two principle for quaternary QQ, with no condition on −disc⁡(q)disc⁡(Q)-\operatorname{disc}(q)\operatorname{disc}(Q) modulo auxiliary primes: prove that for quaternary QQ there is C(Q)C(Q) such that every binary qq primitively represented by the spin genus of QQ with min⁡(q)≥C(Q)\min(q)\geq C(Q) is primitively represented by QQ. This is the codimension-two analogue of the removal of the Linnik-type splitting condition that Einsiedler-Lindenstrauss-Mohammadi-Wieser (2025) achieved in codimension ≥3\geq 3.

A refutation of the main question consists of an explicit QQ together with an infinite family qiq_i of forms primitively represented by the spin genus of QQ, with min⁡(qi)→∞\min(q_i)\to\infty, such that for all sufficiently large ii the form qiq_i is not primitively represented by QQ.

References

  1. Jordan S. Ellenberg and Akshay Venkatesh, 'Local-global principles for representations of quadratic forms', Inventiones Mathematicae 171 (2008), no. 2, 257-279. DOI 10.1007/s00222-007-0077-7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-007-0077-7; extended discussion in the arXiv version, arXiv:math/0604232, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0604232
  2. J. S. Hsia, Y. Kitaoka and M. Kneser, 'Representations of positive definite quadratic forms', Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 301 (1978), 132-141. DOI 10.1515/crll.1978.301.132, https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1978.301.132
  3. W. Duke and R. Schulze-Pillot, 'Representation of integers by positive ternary quadratic forms and equidistribution of lattice points on ellipsoids', Inventiones Mathematicae 99 (1990), no. 1, 49-57. DOI 10.1007/BF01234411, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234411
  4. Marina Ratner, 'Raghunathan's conjectures for Cartesian products of real and p-adic Lie groups', Duke Mathematical Journal 77 (1995), no. 2, 275-382. DOI 10.1215/S0012-7094-95-07710-2, https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-95-07710-2
  5. Jordan S. Ellenberg, Philippe Michel and Akshay Venkatesh, 'Linnik's ergodic method and the distribution of integer points on spheres', expository article (2010). arXiv:1001.0897, https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0897
  6. Manfred Einsiedler, Elon Lindenstrauss, Philippe Michel and Akshay Venkatesh, 'Distribution of periodic torus orbits and Duke's theorem for cubic fields', Annals of Mathematics (2) 173 (2011), no. 2, 815-885. DOI 10.4007/annals.2011.173.2.5, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2011.173.2.5; arXiv:0708.1113, https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.1113
  7. Manfred Einsiedler, Grigory Margulis and Akshay Venkatesh, 'Effective equidistribution for closed orbits of semisimple groups on homogeneous spaces', Inventiones Mathematicae 177 (2009), no. 1, 137-212. DOI 10.1007/s00222-009-0177-7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-009-0177-7
  8. Manfred Einsiedler, Grigory Margulis, Amir Mohammadi and Akshay Venkatesh, 'Effective equidistribution and property (tau)', Journal of the American Mathematical Society 33 (2020), no. 1, 223-289. DOI 10.1090/jams/930, https://doi.org/10.1090/jams/930
  9. Andreas Wieser, 'Effective equidistribution of orbits under semisimple groups on congruence quotients', preprint (2024). arXiv:2407.12760, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12760
  10. Rainer Schulze-Pillot, 'Local conditions for global representations of quadratic forms', Acta Arithmetica 138 (2009), no. 3, 289-299. DOI 10.4064/aa138-3-5, https://doi.org/10.4064/aa138-3-5; arXiv:0804.2158, https://arxiv.org/abs/0804.2158
  11. Manfred Einsiedler and Elon Lindenstrauss, 'Rigidity of non-maximal torus actions, unipotent quantitative recurrence, and Diophantine approximations', preprint (2023). arXiv:2307.04163, https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04163
  12. Rainer Dietmann and Michael Harvey, 'On the representation of quadratic forms by quadratic forms', Michigan Mathematical Journal 62 (2013), no. 4. DOI 10.1307/MMJ/1387226170, https://doi.org/10.1307/MMJ/1387226170; arXiv:1301.6772, https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6772
  13. Rainer Schulze-Pillot, 'Averages of Fourier coefficients of Siegel modular forms and representation of binary quadratic forms by quadratic forms in four variables', Mathematische Annalen 368 (2017), no. 3-4, 923-943. DOI 10.1007/s00208-016-1448-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-016-1448-4
  14. Manfred Einsiedler, Elon Lindenstrauss, Amir Mohammadi and Andreas Wieser, 'Effective equidistribution of semisimple adelic periods and representations of quadratic forms', preprint (2025), 81 pages. arXiv:2503.21068, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21068
  15. Wooyeon Kim, Andreas Wieser and Pengyu Yang, 'Representations of binary forms by quaternary quadratic forms', research announcement, preprint (2025), 10 pages. arXiv:2511.22877, https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22877
  16. Elon Lindenstrauss, Amir Mohammadi and Lei Yang, 'Polynomially effective equidistribution for unipotent orbits in products of SL2\mathrm{SL}_2 factors', research announcement, preprint (2026), 10 pages. arXiv:2601.09983, https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09983