Serre's 1984 paper 'L'invariant de Witt de la forme Tr(x^2)' computes the Witt (Hasse-Witt) invariant of the trace form of an etale algebra, proving , and raises three explicit questions: (1) extend Witt's 1936 explicit construction of solutions of the double-cover embedding problem beyond the few cases Witt treated; (2) construct explicitly the quadratic extension with Galois group over the Galois closure of a trinomial with group , for which Serre proved solvability; (3) decide whether admits a totally real Galois extension with group the Monster , Thompson's rigidity construction yielding only imaginary extensions. Of the paper's three questions, only (3) remains open.
Background
Inverse Galois theory asks which finite groups occur as for a finite Galois extension of the rationals. One construction principle for large simple groups is rigidity: choose a triple of conjugacy classes in whose structure constant is 1 (a rigid triple); the associated branched cover of the projective line is then defined over , and specializations of it realize as a Galois group over . Thompson used this in 1984, with the rigid triple of classes 2A/3B/29A (in ATLAS notation: the conjugacy class of involutions, a class of elements of order 3, and a class of elements of order 29), to construct the first Galois extensions of with group the Monster - the largest sporadic simple group, i.e. the largest of the 26 exceptional finite simple groups lying outside the infinite cyclic, alternating and Lie-type families - of order about ; Serre's Bourbaki exposé 689 (1988) recounts the construction. All fields produced this way are imaginary.
For a finite etale algebra of rank over a field of characteristic not 2 (a product of finite separable field extensions; the case of one factor is a number field), the trace form is a rank- quadratic form over . Its two basic invariants are the discriminant and the Witt invariant , also called the Hasse-Witt invariant: the degree-2 invariant with values in the 2-torsion of the Brauer group of (the group of similarity classes of finite-dimensional central simple -algebras), computable from a diagonalization as the product of quaternion symbols - the quaternion symbol being the Brauer class of the 4-dimensional algebra generated by elements with , , - and the invariant governing the Clifford algebra (the associative algebra canonically attached to a quadratic form) of the form. When is Galois with group , numbering the embeddings defines a 1-cocycle with values in the symmetric group ; pulling back the generator of the mod-2 cohomology (the second Stiefel-Whitney class, a mod-2 characteristic class attached to an orthogonal or permutation representation, of the natural permutation representation of ) gives a class independent of the numbering. Fröhlich (1985) developed the orthogonal-representation framework around these invariants. Serre's Theorem 1 (1984) relates the two sides: , where is the quaternion symbol over .
Over , writing for the number of real embeddings and pairs of complex-conjugate embeddings of (so is totally real exactly when ), Serre's Proposition 3 states: and if and only if and is isomorphic to the diagonal form with entries and entries .
The class is also the shadow of a classical embedding problem. Let , also written , denote the non-split double cover of (one of the two Schur double covers, realized inside a spin group, the double cover of an orthogonal group acting on a Clifford algebra; there is an analogous cover for subgroups ). Given with , the embedding problem asks for a quadratic extension whose Galois group over is the preimage ; solvability is controlled by the vanishing of the corresponding Brauer class. Witt (1936) gave an explicit construction in the cases then accessible, from an isomorphism between the forms and ; Serre recovers Witt's result in his §3.2 and asks for extensions of the construction. Serre's §3.3 determines for algebras defined by trinomials and finds it identically 0 for (the list as printed in the paper); for and the embedding problem is therefore solvable, and Serre asks how to construct such an extension effectively. His §3.4 notes that of the 26 sporadic simple groups, 17 - including the Monster - have Schur multiplier (the second homology group , which governs the central extensions of ) of odd order and hence trivial mod-2 and , so that automatically, and then poses the question that is the subject of this task.
The totally real branch of inverse Galois theory is far less developed than the general problem: the first totally real polynomials with Galois group (the projective symplectic group over the field of two elements, of order about ) were obtained only in 2020 through a computation of multi-branch-point Hurwitz families (moduli spaces of branched covers of the projective line with prescribed Galois group and branch-point count), and 2026 work realizes and totally real via solvable central embedding problems combined with quadratic twists (the standard operation producing from a given realization a quadratic deformation with the same Galois group but possibly different signature). No currently available method enforces for realizations produced by rigidity.
Problem Statement
Part (1) was settled in the later literature and part (2) in principle by a published effective method; the open question is:
Does there exist a totally real Galois extension , that is, with (every embedding has real image), such that is isomorphic to the Monster sporadic simple group ?
Equivalently: an irreducible polynomial with rational coefficients, all of whose roots are real, whose splitting field has Galois group isomorphic to (a totally real Galois extension equals its own Galois closure, so it is totally real exactly when its primitive element has all real roots; conversely the splitting field of an irreducible polynomial with all real roots is totally real, so the two formulations coincide). Thompson's rigidity construction over yields only imaginary -extensions, and no invariant of the source paper obstructs the totally real case: has trivial mod-2 and , so automatically, and satisfies the necessary congruence of Proposition 3. The question must therefore be decided by a construction or an impossibility argument beyond the paper's methods; a proof that no such extension exists resolves it equally.
References
- J.-P. Serre, L'invariant de Witt de la forme Tr(x^2), Comment. Math. Helv. 59 (1984), 651-676. DOI 10.1007/bf02566371, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02566371
- E. Witt, Konstruktion von galoisschen Körpern der Charakteristik p zu vorgegebener Gruppe der Ordnung pf, J. Reine Angew. Math. 174 (1936), 237-245. DOI 10.1515/crll.1936.174.237, https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1936.174.237 (Zbl 0013.19601, https://zbmath.org/0013.19601)
- J. G. Thompson, Some finite groups which appear as Gal L/K, where , J. Algebra 89 (1984), 437-499. DOI 10.1016/0021-8693(84)90228-X, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(84)90228-X
- A. Fröhlich, Orthogonal representations of Galois groups, Stiefel-Whitney classes and Hasse-Witt invariants, J. Reine Angew. Math. 360 (1985), 84-123. DOI 10.1515/crll.1985.360.84, https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1985.360.84
- N. Vila, Polynomials over solving an embedding problem, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 35 (1985), 79-82. DOI 10.5802/aif.1010, https://doi.org/10.5802/aif.1010
- T. Crespo, Explicit construction of type fields, J. Algebra 127 (1989), 452-461. DOI 10.1016/0021-8693(89)90263-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(89)90263-9 (Zbl 0704.11043, https://zbmath.org/0704.11043)
- D. Kotlar, M. Schacher, J. Sonn, Central extensions of symmetric groups as Galois groups, J. Algebra 124 (1989), 183-198. DOI 10.1016/0021-8693(89)90158-0, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(89)90158-0
- J. Sonn, Central extensions of as Galois groups via trinomials, J. Algebra 125 (1989), 320-330. DOI 10.1016/0021-8693(89)90168-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(89)90168-3
- N. Vila, On stem extensions of as Galois group over number fields, J. Algebra 116 (1988), 251-260. DOI 10.1016/0021-8693(88)90205-0, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(88)90205-0
- T. Crespo, Explicit construction of Galois extensions, J. Algebra 129 (1990), 312-319. DOI 10.1016/0021-8693(90)90223-B, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(90)90223-B
- T. Crespo, Erratum (to: Explicit construction of type fields, J. Algebra 127 (1989), 452-461), J. Algebra 157 (1993), 283. DOI 10.1006/jabr.1993.1101, https://doi.org/10.1006/jabr.1993.1101
- T. Crespo, Construction of -fields containing a -field, J. Algebra 201 (1998), 233-242. DOI 10.1006/jabr.1997.7232, https://doi.org/10.1006/jabr.1997.7232
- A. Pacetti, On the embedding problem for representations, Math. Comp. 76 (2007), 2063-2075. DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-07-01940-0, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-07-01940-0
- J.-P. Serre, Groupes de Galois sur , Séminaire Bourbaki 1987-88, exposé 689, Astérisque 161-162 (1988), 73-85. http://www.numdam.org/item/SB_1987-1988__30__73_0/ (Zbl 0684.12009, https://zbmath.org/0684.12009)
- P. Cassou-Noguès, T. Chinburg, B. Morin, M. J. Taylor, On the trace form of Galois algebras, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 50 (2018), 899-915. DOI 10.1112/blms.12193, https://doi.org/10.1112/blms.12193 (arXiv version, titled 'On the trace forms of Galois algebras': arXiv:1707.05049, https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.05049)
- D. Barth, J. König, A. Wenz, An approach for computing families of multi-branch-point covers and applications for symplectic Galois groups, J. Symbolic Comput. 101 (2020), 352-366. DOI 10.1016/j.jsc.2019.10.004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2019.10.004
- J. Ganguly, S. Spallone, Spinorial representations of symmetric groups, J. Algebra 544 (2020), 29-46. DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.09.025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.09.025
- C. B. Khare, A. F. La Rosa, G. Wiese, Splitting fields of (particularly for ), prime decomposition and modular forms, Expo. Math. 41 (2023), 475-491. DOI 10.1016/j.exmath.2023.02.007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exmath.2023.02.007
- J.-P. Serre, Invariants cohomologiques mod 2 et invariants de Witt des groupes alternés, arXiv:2401.12738 (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12738
- E. E. Karabiyik, The groups and are Galois over , arXiv:2609.03946 (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03946