The algebra QnQ_n of pseudo-roots of a generic noncommutative polynomial, introduced by Gelfand, Retakh and Wilson and studied further with S. Gelfand and Serconek, is the quadratic algebra on generators xA,ix_{A,i} modulo the universal diamond relations satisfied by pseudo-roots, designed as an affordable intermediate between the free associative algebra and the free skew field. Its Hilbert series was computed in 2002, and the companion question of that paper, the Koszulity of QnQ_n, was proved affirmatively by Serconek-Wilson and independently by Piontkovski by 2005. What remains open is whether the canonical homomorphism e ⁣:Qn→Ce\colon Q_n\to\mathcal{C} into the free skew field, sending each generator to the actual pseudo-root expressed through Vandermonde quasideterminants, is injective: this is known only for n≤3n\le3 (Gelfand-Retakh-Wilson 2001; the Quasideterminants survey 2005), and the general case is open. The problem is to prove or disprove that ee is injective for every nn, equivalently, whether the pseudo-roots of a generic degree-nn polynomial in the free skew field satisfy exactly the diamond relations.

Background

Let kk be a field. The free associative algebra k⟨x1,…,xn⟩k\langle x_1,\dots,x_n\rangle on nn noncommuting generators admits a universal field of fractions, the free skew field C=k⟨⟨x1,…,xn⟩⟩\mathcal{C}=k\langle\langle x_1,\dots,x_n\rangle\rangle constructed by P. M. Cohn: it is, in a precise sense, the most general division ring generated by x1,…,xnx_1,\dots,x_n, and every rational expression over the xix_i that is invertible somewhere can be interpreted in it.

Fix a central indeterminate tt and a monic polynomial P(t)=tn+a1tn−1+⋯+anP(t)=t^n+a_1t^{n-1}+\dots+a_n with coefficients in an associative unital algebra RR. Over a commutative coefficient ring, factorizations of PP into linear factors differ only by the order of the factors; over a noncommutative ring there can be many essentially different ones. An element y∈Ry\in R is a right root of PP if P(t)P(t) is right-divisible by t−yt-y, and a pseudo-root of PP if P(t)=q1(t)(t−y)q2(t)P(t)=q_1(t)(t-y)q_2(t) for some q1,q2∈R[t]q_1,q_2\in R[t]; pseudo-roots interpolate between the roots appearing in different factorizations of the same polynomial. When x1,…,xn∈Rx_1,\dots,x_n\in R form a generic set of right roots of PP (meaning every Vandermonde submatrix in the xix_i is invertible), a noncommutative analogue of Viete's theorem due to Gelfand and Retakh, based on the theory of quasideterminants, produces from every ordering (i1,…,in)(i_1,\dots,i_n) a full factorization

P(t)=(t−xAn−1,in)(t−xAn−2,in−1)⋯(t−xA0,i1)P(t)=(t-x_{A_{n-1},i_n})(t-x_{A_{n-2},i_{n-1}})\cdots(t-x_{A_0,i_1})

with Aj={i1,…,ij}A_j=\{i_1,\dots,i_j\}, and expresses the coefficients ama_m as the elementary symmetric functions of the factors; this is the starting point of the theory of noncommutative symmetric functions. Here a quasideterminant is the noncommutative substitute for the determinant of a matrix over a division ring (the (i,j)(i,j)-quasideterminant is the reciprocal of the (i,j)(i,j)-entry of the inverse matrix), and the pseudo-root attached to a subset A={i1,…,ik}A=\{i_1,\dots,i_k\} and an index i∉Ai\notin A is the conjugate

xA,i=V(xi1,…,xik,xi) xi V(xi1,…,xik,xi)−1x_{A,i}=V(x_{i_1},\dots,x_{i_k},x_i)\,x_i\,V(x_{i_1},\dots,x_{i_k},x_i)^{-1}

of xix_i, where V(y1,…,ym)V(y_1,\dots,y_m) denotes the Vandermonde quasideterminant, the (1,m)(1,m)-quasideterminant of the Vandermonde matrix in y1,…,ymy_1,\dots,y_m.

The pseudo-roots of any such PP satisfy universal quadratic-linear identities, the diamond relations

xA∪{i},j+xA,i=xA∪{j},i+xA,j,xA∪{i},j xA,i=xA∪{j},i xA,jx_{A\cup\{i\},j}+x_{A,i}=x_{A\cup\{j\},i}+x_{A,j},\qquad x_{A\cup\{i\},j}\,x_{A,i}=x_{A\cup\{j\},i}\,x_{A,j}

for i≠ji\neq j outside AA, equivalently (t−xA∪{i},j)(t−xA,i)=(t−xA∪{j},i)(t−xA,j)(t-x_{A\cup\{i\},j})(t-x_{A,i})=(t-x_{A\cup\{j\},i})(t-x_{A,j}); these encode the independence of the displayed factorization of the chosen ordering. Gelfand, Retakh and Wilson therefore defined the universal algebra of pseudo-roots QnQ_n: the algebra over kk with one generator xA,ix_{A,i} for each pair (A,i)(A,i) with A⊆{1,…,n}A\subseteq\{1,\dots,n\} and i∉Ai\notin A, modulo the diamond relations. Their stated motivation is economic: addition and multiplication are cheap operations while division is expensive, so one wants an algebra strictly between the free associative algebra, which contains no pseudo-roots beyond the roots themselves, and the gigantic free skew field; QnQ_n is designed to be that affordable intermediate.

The structural theory of QnQ_n is now rather complete. It is a quadratic algebra (in the alternative generators rAr_A, indexed by the nonempty subsets AA, the relations become homogeneous quadratic), and Gelfand, Gelfand, Retakh, Serconek and Wilson computed its Hilbert series, H(Qn,t)=(1−t)/(1−t(2−t)n)H(Q_n,t)=(1-t)/(1-t(2-t)^n), where the Hilbert series of a graded algebra is the generating function of the dimensions of its graded components, as well as that of its quadratic dual Qn!Q_n^! (the algebra on the dual space of generators with the orthogonally complementary relations), which is finite-dimensional with H(Qn!,t)=(1+t(2+t)n)/(1+t)H(Q_n^!,t)=(1+t(2+t)^n)/(1+t). The numerically necessary Koszulity condition H(Qn,t)H(Qn!,−t)=1H(Q_n,t)H(Q_n^!,-t)=1 held, and the question whether QnQ_n is a Koszul algebra (a quadratic algebra is Koszul when the trivial module kk admits a linear free resolution) was settled affirmatively by Serconek and Wilson and, independently, by Piontkovski: QnQ_n is Koszul of global dimension nn for every n≥2n\ge2. In addition, QnQ_n has an explicit normal-form basis of monomials in the rAr_A, each of the n!n! subalgebras generated by the pseudo-roots along one ordering is free on nn generators, and the intersection of all these subalgebras is precisely the algebra of noncommutative symmetric functions, a noncommutative analogue of the classical description of symmetric functions.

What remains unresolved is whether the abstract algebra QnQ_n faithfully models actual pseudo-roots. Specializing the construction to the free skew field itself, the elements

V(xi1,…,xik,xi) xi V(xi1,…,xik,xi)−1V(x_{i_1},\dots,x_{i_k},x_i)\,x_i\,V(x_{i_1},\dots,x_{i_k},x_i)^{-1}

satisfy the diamond relations, so there is a canonical homomorphism e ⁣:Qn→Ce\colon Q_n\to\mathcal{C} sending the generator xA,ix_{A,i} to the actual pseudo-root, with image the subalgebra Q^n⊆C\hat Q_n\subseteq\mathcal{C} generated by the pseudo-roots of a generic polynomial of degree nn. Gelfand, Retakh and Wilson proved that ee is injective for n=2n=2, and the Quasideterminants survey records the additional case n=3n=3; the general statement was published by its authors as a conjecture and echoed in the 2002 Hilbert-series paper as a belief that ee is an embedding. That conjecture is the problem below.

Problem Statement

Prove or disprove: the canonical homomorphism

e ⁣:Qn⟶Ce\colon Q_n\longrightarrow\mathcal{C}

from the universal algebra of pseudo-roots QnQ_n (the algebra over a field kk with generators xA,ix_{A,i} for all A⊆{1,…,n}A\subseteq\{1,\dots,n\} and i∉Ai\notin A, modulo the diamond relations

xA∪{i},j+xA,i=xA∪{j},i+xA,j,xA∪{i},j xA,i=xA∪{j},i xA,jx_{A\cup\{i\},j}+x_{A,i}=x_{A\cup\{j\},i}+x_{A,j},\qquad x_{A\cup\{i\},j}\,x_{A,i}=x_{A\cup\{j\},i}\,x_{A,j}

for i≠ji\neq j outside AA) into the free skew field C=k⟨⟨x1,…,xn⟩⟩\mathcal{C}=k\langle\langle x_1,\dots,x_n\rangle\rangle, defined on generators by

e(xA,i)=V(xi1,…,xik,xi) xi V(xi1,…,xik,xi)−1(A={i1,…,ik}),e(x_{A,i})=V(x_{i_1},\dots,x_{i_k},x_i)\,x_i\,V(x_{i_1},\dots,x_{i_k},x_i)^{-1}\qquad(A=\{i_1,\dots,i_k\}),

with VV the Vandermonde quasideterminant, is injective for every n≥2n\ge2. The cases n≤3n\le3 are known, so the open content is every n≥4n\ge4.

Equivalent formulations of the same statement: (i) Qn≅Q^nQ_n\cong\hat Q_n, where Q^n\hat Q_n is the subalgebra of the free skew field generated by the pseudo-roots of a generic polynomial of degree nn; (ii) every polynomial relation satisfied by the pseudo-roots xA,ix_{A,i} in C\mathcal{C} is a consequence of the diamond relations; (iii) the kernel of ee is zero, that is, no nonzero element of QnQ_n vanishes identically as a rational function of the generic roots x1,…,xnx_1,\dots,x_n.

The Koszulity of QnQ_n, raised alongside this question in the source paper, is settled affirmatively and is not part of the present problem.

References

  1. Israel Gelfand, Vladimir Retakh, Robert Lee Wilson, Quadratic linear algebras associated with factorizations of noncommutative polynomials and noncommutative differential polynomials, Selecta Mathematica 7 (2001) 493-523, DOI 10.1007/s00029-001-8096-5, arXiv:math/0002238, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-001-8096-5
  2. Israel Gelfand, Sergei Gelfand, Vladimir Retakh, Shirlei Serconek, Robert Lee Wilson, Hilbert series of quadratic algebras associated with pseudo-roots of noncommutative polynomials, Journal of Algebra 254 (2002) 279-299, DOI 10.1016/S0021-8693(02)00081-9, arXiv:math/0109007, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8693(02)00081-9
  3. Shirlei Serconek, Robert Lee Wilson, The quadratic algebras associated with pseudo-roots of noncommutative polynomials are Koszul algebras, Journal of Algebra 278 (2004) 473-493, DOI 10.1016/S0021-8693(03)00340-5, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8693(03)00340-5
  4. Dmitri Piontkovski, Algebras associated to pseudo-roots of noncommutative polynomials are Koszul, International Journal of Algebra and Computation 15 (2005) 643-648, DOI 10.1142/S0218196705002396, arXiv:math/0405375, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218196705002396
  5. Israel Gelfand, Sergei Gelfand, Vladimir Retakh, Robert Lee Wilson, Quasideterminants, Advances in Mathematics 193 (2005) 56-141, DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2004.03.018, arXiv:math/0208146, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2004.03.018
  6. Israel Gelfand, Vladimir Retakh, Shirlei Serconek, Robert Lee Wilson, On a class of algebras associated to directed graphs, Selecta Mathematica 11 (2005) 281-295, DOI 10.1007/s00029-005-0005-X, arXiv:math/0506507, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-005-0005-X
  7. Israel Gelfand, Sergei Gelfand, Vladimir Retakh, Robert Lee Wilson, Factorizations of polynomials over noncommutative algebras and sufficient sets of edges in directed graphs, Letters in Mathematical Physics 74 (2005) 153-167, DOI 10.1007/s11005-005-0024-8, arXiv:math/0509260, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-005-0024-8
  8. Vladimir Retakh, From factorizations of noncommutative polynomials to combinatorial topology, Open Mathematics 8 (2010) 235-243, DOI 10.2478/s11533-010-0008-5, arXiv:0911.4454, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11533-010-0008-5
  9. Vladimir Retakh, Michael Saks, On the rational relationships among pseudo-roots of a non-commutative polynomial, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 225 (2021) 106581, DOI 10.1016/j.jpaa.2020.106581, arXiv:2001.04856, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2020.106581
  10. Tyler Kloefkorn, Brad Shelton, Splitting algebras: Koszul, Cohen-Macaulay and numerically Koszul, Journal of Algebra 422 (2015) 660-682, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.08.050, arXiv:1207.1330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.08.050
  11. Karoline Victor Fernandes, Jose Eder Salvador de Vasconcelos, Hilbert series of certain layered directed graphs via poset cohomology, Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics 62 (2025), no. 4, article 55, DOI 10.1007/s10801-025-01487-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10801-025-01487-3