For a set of points in the Euclidean plane, let be the number of distinct distances from to the other points of , and let be the minimum of over all -point sets . Erdős and Fishburn (Discrete Math. 175 (1997) 97-132) determined , classified the minimizers for , and proved that every small except has a subset of the triangular lattice among its sum-minimizing configurations; the 8-point extremal configuration (a square with equilateral triangles erected inward on its sides, every point at exactly three distances) was attributed to Heiko Harborth, with uniqueness left open. The uniqueness of the 8-point minimizer was later resolved by Fishburn (Discrete Math. 252 (2002) 103-122), where is shown to be uniquely characterized among eight-point configurations and is conjectured; Nozaki and Shinohara (J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 117 (2010) 810-826) reproduce the 8-point results in the language of locally three-distance sets. Two main questions remain open: Erdős's 1975 conjecture that - an averaged strengthening of the distinct distances problem, which Guth and Katz (Ann. of Math. 181 (2015) 155-190) resolved only in the weaker global form , the best known bound for the pinned single-point variant being due to Katz and Tardos - and the conjecture that for all sufficiently large the configurations minimizing are subsets of the triangular lattice. Neither the lower bound for , the lattice conjecture, nor the value of has been resolved.
Background
The distinct distances problem of Erdős (1946) asks for , the minimum number of distinct pairwise distances determined by points in the Euclidean plane. A section of the integer lattice determines distinct distances - the number of integers up to that are sums of two squares is by the Landau-Ramanujan theorem, and the analogous statement for the norm form of the triangular lattice (the quadratic form giving the squared distance between two triangular-lattice points) holds by the same analytic number theory - and Erdős conjectured this to be optimal. Guth and Katz proved , leaving only a gap in the count; the companion structural question, whether near-extremal configurations must have lattice structure, remains wide open.
This record concerns the per-point refinement introduced by Erdős and Fishburn in 1997. For an -point set , the distance count of a point , written , is the number of distinct distances from to the other points; writing , the nondecreasing rearrangement is the ordered distance-count vector, and denotes the family of all vectors arising this way. (In later terminology, a set every point of which has distance count at most is a locally -distance set.) The paper's central quantity is
the minimum total number of distinct distances seen from the points of the set. Erdős had conjectured in 1975 that every -point set satisfies , where means 'at least a fixed positive constant multiple of'; since each point of a large triangular-lattice section has distance count , the conjecture is equivalent to , that is, to the statement that lattice sections are asymptotically optimal for . The weaker pinned question - whether some single point must determine distances - is also open, with best bound due to Katz and Tardos.
The triangular lattice is the set of integer linear combinations of and , the vertex set of the regular tiling by equilateral triangles. Erdős and Fishburn proved ; for each they determined all minimizing configurations up to similarity (that is, modulo rotations, reflections, translations, and dilations of the plane), with uniqueness exactly for . The 8-point extremal configuration, attributed to Heiko Harborth and denoted , is obtained from a square by erecting an equilateral triangle inward on each of the four sides; the four square vertices together with the four triangle apexes give eight points, each at exactly three distinct distances from the others, so its distance-count vector is and its total is . They further observed that every small except has a subset of among its sum-minimizing configurations. On this evidence the paper left open: (i) Erdős's 1975 lower-bound conjecture ; (ii) the conjecture that for all sufficiently large the configurations that minimize are subsets of ; and (iii) the uniqueness of the 8-point minimizer, which the paper reduced to two technical geometric subclaims and left unproved.
Problem Statement
Determine the minimum total distance count and the structure of its minimizers, in the precise form left open by Erdős-Fishburn (1997) and still unresolved.
Definitions. Throughout, ranges over sets of distinct points in the Euclidean plane ; is the number of distinct distances from to the other points of ; the ordered distance-count vector of is the nondecreasing rearrangement of the values , ; is the minimum of over all -point sets ; and , the triangular lattice, is the set of integer linear combinations of and .
(1) Asymptotics (Erdős 1975, restated in the source paper). Prove or refute: there exists a constant such that, for every integer and every -point set ,
equivalently, since triangular-lattice sections give , prove or refute .
(2) Lattice structure of minimizers. Prove or refute: there exists such that, for every , every configuration of points attaining is, up to similarity (a rotation, reflection, translation, or dilation of the plane), a subset of the triangular lattice . The only known departures from the pattern that a lattice subset attains the minimum are and .
(3) Exact small values and complete classification. Continue the exact determination of and of all minimizing configurations: in particular determine - Fishburn (2002) conjectured , attained by a configuration with ordered distance-count vector - and, as optional extensions beyond the required boundary, further exact values with full minimizer lists.
Items (1) and (2) are the core conjectures; item (3) is the finite initial segment of the same determination, whose first open case is .
References
- Paul Erdős and Peter Fishburn, Distinct distances in finite planar sets, Discrete Mathematics 175 (1997) 97-132. DOI 10.1016/S0012-365X(96)00145-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(96)00145-8. [Introduces the distance-count vector , the quantity , the exact values , and the minimizer classifications for .]
- Peter C. Fishburn, A remarkable eight-point planar configuration, Discrete Mathematics 252 (2002) 103-122. DOI 10.1016/S0012-365X(01)00134-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(01)00134-0. [Resolves the uniqueness of the 8-point minimizer and conjectures with ordered distance-count vector .]
- Hiroshi Nozaki and Masashi Shinohara, On a generalization of distance sets, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 117 (2010) 810-826. DOI 10.1016/j.jcta.2009.11.001, arXiv:0906.0199. https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.0199. [Proposition 4.18 restates the 8-point minimum total 24 and the unique locally three-distance set; introduces the locally -distance set framework.]
- Adam Sheffer, Distinct Distances: Open Problems and Current Bounds, arXiv:1406.1949 (2014, revised 2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1949. [States that little is known about the lattice structure of near-optimal sets and notes the companion Erdős-Fishburn lattice conjecture for the number of distinct distances; does not list the problem.]
- Larry Guth and Nets Hawk Katz, On the Erdős distinct distances problem in the plane, Annals of Mathematics 181 (2015) 155-190. DOI 10.4007/annals.2015.181.1.2, arXiv:1011.4105. https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2015.181.1.2. [Supplies the global bound that leaves the averaged sum conjecture open.]
- Nets Hawk Katz and Gábor Tardos, A new entropy inequality for the Erdős distance problem, in: Towards a Theory of Geometric Graphs, Contemporary Mathematics 342, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2004) 119-126. DOI 10.1090/conm/342/06136. https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/342/06136. [Best known pinned-distance bound .]
- Paul Erdős, On some problems of elementary and combinatorial geometry, Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (4) 103 (1975) 99-108. DOI 10.1007/BF02414146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02414146. [Origin of the sum conjecture .]
- Paul Erdős and Peter Fishburn, Maximum planar sets that determine k distances, Discrete Mathematics 160 (1996) 115-125. DOI 10.1016/0012-365X(95)00153-N. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(95)00153-N. [Companion paper whose lattice conjecture for maximal -distance sets is the structural sibling of the lattice conjecture.]
- Vajresh Balaji, Olivia Edwards, Anne Marie Loftin, Solomon Mcharo, Lo Phillips, Alex Rice, and Bineyam Tsegaye, Lattice Configurations Determining Few Distances, arXiv:1911.11688 (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11688. [Computational study of remarks of Erdős-Fishburn 1996 on maximal few-distance sets; does not address .]
- Vojtech Bálint, Some Famous Problems of Discrete Geometry, Acta Mathematica Nitriensia 1 (2015) 24-43. DOI 10.17846/AMN.2015.1.1.24-43. https://doi.org/10.17846/AMN.2015.1.1.24-43. [Cites the 1997 paper among minimum-distance problems.]
- Erdős Problems (erdosproblems.com), entry #604, Pinned distances, https://www.erdosproblems.com/604, and entry #89, https://www.erdosproblems.com/89. [Entry #604 records Erdős's averaged sum conjecture as open, with best pinned bound due to Katz and Tardos; entry #89 records the global distinct-distances problem as nearly solved by Guth and Katz.]