For the Cauchy problem □u+G(u′,u′′)=0\Box u+G(u',u'')=0 in R1+3\mathbb{R}^{1+3}, where □=∂t2−Δ\Box=\partial_t^2-\Delta, G∈C∞G\in C^\infty vanishes to second order at the origin, and the initial data are compactly supported of size ε\varepsilon, Hörmander (1989) proved the lifespan lower bound lim inf⁡ε→0εlog⁡Tε≥A\liminf_{\varepsilon\to0}\varepsilon\log T_\varepsilon\ge A: the classical solution exists beyond times eB/εe^{B/\varepsilon} for every B<AB<A, where the constant AA is explicitly computable from the Friedlander radiation field of the data and the quadratic part of GG through a generalized Burgers profile equation, and the rescaled solution converges to that profile. This problem asks to prove the matching upper bound, hence lim⁡ε→0εlog⁡Tε=A\lim_{\varepsilon\to0}\varepsilon\log T_\varepsilon=A, for general non-symmetric data in three dimensions — sharp lifespan constants are known in two dimensions and in three dimensions only under radial symmetry for special model equations. The literature through September 2026 records no matching upper bound at this generality.

Background

The small-data problem and the lifespan. For a nonlinear wave equation in three space dimensions with initial data of size ε>0\varepsilon>0, the lifespan TεT_\varepsilon is the supremum of the times up to which a classical (C∞C^\infty) solution exists. The central question of the small-data theory is the sharp asymptotic behavior of TεT_\varepsilon as ε→0\varepsilon\to0: whether Tε=∞T_\varepsilon=\infty (global existence), whether TεT_\varepsilon grows algebraically in 1/ε1/\varepsilon, or whether TεT_\varepsilon grows exponentially, Tε≈ec/εT_\varepsilon\approx e^{c/\varepsilon} (almost global existence). By the dependence of the nonlinearity one distinguishes semilinear equations (the nonlinearity involves uu and its first derivatives u′u'), quasilinear equations (the coefficients multiplying the second derivatives depend on uu and u′u'), and fully nonlinear equations (arbitrary smooth dependence on the second derivatives u′′u'' as well); this problem concerns the fully nonlinear class □u+G(u′,u′′)=0\Box u+G(u',u'')=0, where □=∂t2−Δ\Box=\partial_t^2-\Delta, G∈C∞G\in C^\infty vanishes to second order at the origin, and the data are u(0,x)=εu0(x)u(0,x)=\varepsilon u_0(x), ∂tu(0,x)=εu1(x)\partial_t u(0,x)=\varepsilon u_1(x) with u0,u1∈C0∞(R3)u_0,u_1\in C_0^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3).

Dimension three as the borderline; the null condition. The free wave in three spatial dimensions decays at the borderline rate t−1t^{-1}, so quadratic nonlinearities sit exactly at the threshold between global existence and finite-time blowup. John (1979) showed that blowup does occur for nonlinear wave equations in three dimensions; John–Klainerman (1984) proved almost global existence, Tε≥ec/εT_\varepsilon\ge e^{c/\varepsilon}, for general quadratic nonlinearities; and the null condition of Klainerman (1986) — the requirement that the quadratic part of the nonlinearity vanish on every null pair of directions (pairs of vectors with zero Minkowski inner product), which rules out the resonant interactions along the light cone responsible for blowup — identifies the special quadratic forms for which global existence holds in three dimensions. In dimensions n≥4n\ge4 the faster decay gives global small-data existence (Christodoulou 1986 and others, as recorded in the 2026 review table of Ding–Hou–Yin).

Hörmander's theorem (the source). Hörmander (1987, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1256, quasilinear case; 1989, fully nonlinear case — the source of this problem, doi:10.1007/BF02585465) showed that the long-time behavior is governed by a generalized Burgers equation satisfied by the profile of the solution near the outgoing light cone. The Friedlander radiation field — the asymptotic coefficient of the free wave at future null infinity, which encodes each linear solution by a function on the sphere of outgoing directions together with the distance along the cone — is F(ω,q)=14π(R(ω,q;u1)−∂qR(ω,q;u0))F(\omega,q)=\frac{1}{4\pi}(R(\omega,q;u_1)-\partial_q R(\omega,q;u_0)), where R(ω,q;g)=∫⟨ω,y⟩=qg(y) dS(y)R(\omega,q;g)=\int_{\langle\omega,y\rangle=q}g(y)\,dS(y) is the Radon transform (the integral of gg over the plane with normal ω∈S2\omega\in S^2 at signed distance qq). The profile U(ω,s,q)U(\omega,s,q) solves, in the slow time s=εlog⁡ts=\varepsilon\log t, the equation ∂sUq=a(ω)(∂qUq)2+2b(ω)Uq ∂qUq+c(ω)Uq2\partial_s U_q=a(\omega)(\partial_q U_q)^2+2b(\omega)U_q\,\partial_q U_q+c(\omega)U_q^2 with U(ω,0,q)=F(ω,q)U(\omega,0,q)=F(\omega,q), where a,b,ca,b,c are the three coefficients of the quadratic part of GG in the null frame (a basis containing two directions tangent to the scaled light cones and two null directions transverse to them) of the direction ω\omega. The profile is smooth exactly for s<As<A, where 1/A1/A is the maximum over (ω,q)(\omega,q) of I1(ω,q)+I2(ω,q)\sqrt{I_1(\omega,q)}+I_2(\omega,q) with I1=a(aFqqq2+2bFqqqFqq+cFqq2)I_1=a(aF_{qqq}^2+2bF_{qqq}F_{qq}+cF_{qq}^2) and I2=aFqqq+2bFqq+cFqI_2=aF_{qqq}+2bF_{qq}+cF_q (derivatives in qq; non-real values of the square root omitted); some third derivatives of UU blow up as s↑As\uparrow A while UU and its first and second derivatives remain bounded. The main theorem of the 1989 paper: for every B<AB<A and sufficiently small ε\varepsilon the classical solution exists on 0≤t≤eB/ε0\le t\le e^{B/\varepsilon}, and the rescaled solution ε−1r uε(t,rω)\varepsilon^{-1}r\,u_\varepsilon(t,r\omega) (with t=es/εt=e^{s/\varepsilon}, r=t+qr=t+q) converges uniformly to U(ω,s,q)U(\omega,s,q); in particular lim inf⁡ε→0εlog⁡Tε≥A\liminf_{\varepsilon\to0}\varepsilon\log T_\varepsilon\ge A. The lower bound is proved through an explicit approximate solution whose residual is integrable over the exponential time scale. Thus AA is the conjecturally sharp lifespan exponent. For the reduced one-dimensional generalized Burgers equations the same paper derives complete, explicit, two-sided lifespan formulas in all parameter regimes (the regimes a=0a=0 and b2−acb^2-ac negative, zero, positive), including an exceptional class of global data; but at the level of the full three-dimensional Cauchy problem only the lower bound is known for general data.

Surrounding sharp results. In two space dimensions sharp lifespan laws are known for quadratic quasilinear equations: Alinhac (1999) obtained a complete asymptotic expansion of the lifespan and cusp-type blowup (the graph of the solution develops a cusp-shaped derivative singularity along a characteristic rather than a jump) for non-rotationally-invariant data, with later extensions to coefficients depending on uu and ∇u\nabla u (Ding–Witt–Yin 2013) and to fully nonlinear equations (Han–Jin 2016); the 2026 research paper of Ding–Hou–Yin records the sharp two-dimensional law lim⁡ε→0+εTεC=τ~0\lim_{\varepsilon\to0+}\varepsilon\sqrt{T_\varepsilon^C}=\tilde\tau_0, with τ~0=(max⁡Q1st(ω~) ∂σ2F~0)−1\tilde\tau_0=(\max Q_{1st}(\tilde\omega)\,\partial_\sigma^2\tilde F_0)^{-1} (their equation (1.22)). In three dimensions, sharp asymptotics are known only for special model equations under radial symmetry (Ding–Witt–Yin 2013); for general data with the null condition failing, the same paper records only the lower bound Tε≥eC/εT_\varepsilon\ge e^{C/\varepsilon}. As background on the adjacent extended class □u+G(u,u′,u′′)=0\Box u+G(u,u',u'')=0, which is not part of this problem: Lindblad (1990) proved in 1+31+3 dimensions that the lifespan exceeds c ε−2c\,\varepsilon^{-2} without the hypothesis ∂u2G(0)=0\partial_u^2 G(0)=0 and that almost global existence Tε≥ec/εT_\varepsilon\ge e^{c/\varepsilon} holds for scalar equations with it; neither order is known to be sharp in general (Metcalfe–Rhoads 2023 for systems), and Hörmander's 1991 sequel notes that in low dimension the results are not always optimal when GG depends on uu itself. Likewise as background only: the modern continuation-past-blowup theory — shock formation for quasilinear waves whenever the null condition fails (Speck 2016) and the shock development problem for compressible Euler flow (Christodoulou 2019; Christodoulou–Lisibach 2016; Abbrescia–Speck 2022) — exists for quasilinear and first-order systems, not for the fully nonlinear class of this problem.

Problem Statement

Consider, in three space dimensions, the Cauchy problem

□u+G(u′,u′′)=0  in  R1+3,u(0,x)=εu0(x),∂tu(0,x)=εu1(x),\Box u+G(u',u'')=0\ \text{ in }\ \mathbb{R}^{1+3},\qquad u(0,x)=\varepsilon u_0(x),\quad \partial_t u(0,x)=\varepsilon u_1(x),

where □=∂t2−Δ\Box=\partial_t^2-\Delta, u′=(∂αu)α=0,1,2,3u'=(\partial_\alpha u)_{\alpha=0,1,2,3} denotes the first derivatives, u′′=(∂αβu)0≤α≤β≤3u''=(\partial_{\alpha\beta}u)_{0\le\alpha\le\beta\le3} the second derivatives, G∈C∞G\in C^\infty vanishes together with its first derivatives at the origin, u0,u1∈C0∞(R3)u_0,u_1\in C_0^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3), and 0<ε≪10<\varepsilon\ll1. Let TεT_\varepsilon be the lifespan of the classical solution (the supremum of times up to which a C∞C^\infty solution exists). Let a(ω),b(ω),c(ω)a(\omega),b(\omega),c(\omega), ω∈S2\omega\in S^2, be the three coefficients of the quadratic part of GG in the null frame (a basis of two directions tangent to the scaled light cones and two null directions transverse to them) of the light-cone direction ω\omega, as defined in Hörmander (1989); let F(ω,q)=14π(R(ω,q;u1)−∂qR(ω,q;u0))F(\omega,q)=\frac{1}{4\pi}(R(\omega,q;u_1)-\partial_q R(\omega,q;u_0)) be the Friedlander radiation field of the linear data, where R(ω,q;g)=∫⟨ω,y⟩=qg(y) dS(y)R(\omega,q;g)=\int_{\langle\omega,y\rangle=q}g(y)\,dS(y) is the Radon transform (the integral of gg over the plane with normal ω\omega at signed distance qq); and define

1A=max⁡ω∈S2, q∈R(a(ω)(a(ω)Fqqq2+2b(ω)FqqqFqq+c(ω)Fqq2)+a(ω)Fqqq+2b(ω)Fqq+c(ω)Fq),\frac{1}{A}=\max_{\omega\in S^2,\,q\in\mathbb{R}}\Big(\sqrt{a(\omega)\big(a(\omega)F_{qqq}^2+2b(\omega)F_{qqq}F_{qq}+c(\omega)F_{qq}^2\big)}+a(\omega)F_{qqq}+2b(\omega)F_{qq}+c(\omega)F_q\Big),

with derivatives taken in qq and the convention that non-real values of the square root are omitted; equivalently, AA is the maximal slow time s=εlog⁡ts=\varepsilon\log t up to which the generalized Burgers profile

∂sUq=a(ω)(∂qUq)2+2b(ω)Uq ∂qUq+c(ω)Uq2,U(ω,0,q)=F(ω,q),\partial_s U_q=a(\omega)(\partial_q U_q)^2+2b(\omega)U_q\,\partial_q U_q+c(\omega)U_q^2,\qquad U(\omega,0,q)=F(\omega,q),

remains smooth (some third derivatives of UU blow up as s↑As\uparrow A). Hörmander (1989) proved lim inf⁡ε→0εlog⁡Tε≥A\liminf_{\varepsilon\to0}\varepsilon\log T_\varepsilon\ge A, and this remains the best known bound for general data.

The problem is to decide whether this lower bound is sharp. For data u0,u1∈C0∞(R3)u_0,u_1\in C_0^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3) with 0<A<∞0<A<\infty — that is, the displayed maximum is positive, equivalently the generalized Burgers profile ceases to be smooth at the finite slow time AA — and with no radial symmetry or other structural restriction on the data, prove or disprove that

lim⁡ε→0εlog⁡Tε=A,\lim_{\varepsilon\to0}\varepsilon\log T_\varepsilon=A,

equivalently, establish the matching upper bound lim sup⁡ε→0εlog⁡Tε≤A\limsup_{\varepsilon\to0}\varepsilon\log T_\varepsilon\le A. When the displayed maximum is ≤0\le 0 the profile is globally smooth and A=∞A=\infty (the exceptional global-data regime of the reduced Burgers analysis), the displayed equation for 1/A1/A applying only when this maximum is positive; such data lie outside the conjecture's scope.

References

  1. Lars Hörmander, "The fully non-linear Cauchy problem with small data", Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática 20 (1989), no. 1, pp. 1–27, doi:10.1007/BF02585465, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02585465
  2. Lars Hörmander, "The lifespan of classical solutions of non-linear hyperbolic equations", in: Pseudo-Differential Operators, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1256, Springer (1987), pp. 214–280, doi:10.1007/BFb0077745, https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0077745
  3. Lars Hörmander, "On the Fully Non-Linear Cauchy Problem with Small Data. II", in: Microlocal Analysis and Nonlinear Waves, IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications 30, Springer (1991), pp. 51–81, doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-9136-4_6, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9136-4_6
  4. Fritz John, "Blow-up of solutions of nonlinear wave equations in three space dimensions", Manuscripta Mathematica 28 (1979), no. 1, pp. 235–268, doi:10.1007/BF01647974, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01647974
  5. Fritz John and Sergiu Klainerman, "Almost global existence to nonlinear wave equations in three dimensions", Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 37 (1984), no. 4, pp. 443–455, doi:10.1002/cpa.3160370403, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160370403
  6. Demetrios Christodoulou, "Global solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations for small initial data", Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 39 (1986), no. 2, pp. 267–282, doi:10.1002/cpa.3160390205, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160390205
  7. Sergiu Klainerman, "The null condition and global existence to nonlinear wave equations", in: Nonlinear Systems of Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics (Proc. SIAM-AMS Summer Seminar, Santa Fe, NM, 1984), Lectures in Applied Mathematics 23, Pt. 1, American Mathematical Society (1986), pp. 293–326
  8. Hans Lindblad, "On the lifespan of solutions of nonlinear wave equations with small initial data", Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 43 (1990), no. 4, pp. 445–472, doi:10.1002/cpa.3160430403, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160430403
  9. Ta-Tsien Li and Xin Yu, "Life-span of classical solutions to fully nonlinear wave equations", Communications in Partial Differential Equations 16 (1991), no. 6–7, pp. 909–940, doi:10.1080/03605309108820785, https://doi.org/10.1080/03605309108820785
  10. Ta-Tsien Li and Yi Zhou, "Life-span of classical solutions to fully nonlinear wave equations—II", Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 19 (1992), no. 8, pp. 833–853, doi:10.1016/0362-546X(92)90054-I, https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(92)90054-I
  11. Ta-Tsien Li and Yi Zhou, "A note on the life-span of classical solutions to nonlinear wave equations in four space dimensions", Indiana University Mathematics Journal 44 (1995), no. 4, doi:10.1512/iumj.1995.44.2026, https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1995.44.2026
  12. Serge Alinhac, "Blowup of Small Data Solutions for a Quasilinear Wave Equation in Two Space Dimensions", Annals of Mathematics (2) 149 (1999), no. 1, pp. 97–127, doi:10.2307/121020, https://doi.org/10.2307/121020, preprint arXiv:math/9901146, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9901146
  13. Serge Alinhac, "Blowup of small data solutions for a class of quasilinear wave equations in two space dimensions, II", Acta Mathematica 182 (1999), pp. 1–23, doi:10.1007/BF02392822, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392822
  14. Bingbing Ding, Ingo Witt, and Huicheng Yin, "Blowup of classical solutions for a class of 3-D quasilinear wave equations with small initial data", preprint (2013), arXiv:1303.4225, https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.4225
  15. Bingbing Ding, Ingo Witt, and Huicheng Yin, "Blowup of smooth solutions for general 2-D quasilinear wave equations with small initial data", preprint (2013), arXiv:1307.1978, https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.1978
  16. Wei Han and Zhen Jin, "Life-span of classical solutions to two dimensional fully nonlinear wave equations", Journal of Functional Analysis 270 (2016), no. 12, pp. 4087–4116, doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2016.03.016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2016.03.016
  17. Jason Metcalfe and Taylor Rhoads, "Long-time Existence for Systems of Quasilinear Wave Equations", La Matematica 2 (2023), no. 1, pp. 37–84, doi:10.1007/s44007-022-00036-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44007-022-00036-9, preprint arXiv:2203.08599, https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08599
  18. Bingbing Ding, Fei Hou, and Huicheng Yin, "The sharp lifespan of small data smooth solutions to 2-D quadratic quasilinear wave equations in exterior domains", preprint (2026), arXiv:2606.13996, https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13996
  19. Jared Speck, "Shock Formation in Small-Data Solutions to 3D Quasilinear Wave Equations", Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 214, American Mathematical Society (2016), doi:10.1090/surv/214, https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/214, preprint arXiv:1407.6320, https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.6320
  20. Demetrios Christodoulou, "The Shock Development Problem", EMS Monographs in Mathematics, European Mathematical Society (2019), doi:10.4171/192, https://doi.org/10.4171/192, preprint arXiv:1705.00828, https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.00828
  21. Demetrios Christodoulou and André Lisibach, "Shock Development in Spherical Symmetry", Annals of PDE 2 (2016), no. 1, Article 3, doi:10.1007/s40818-016-0009-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40818-016-0009-1
  22. Leo Abbrescia and Jared Speck, "The emergence of the singular boundary from the crease in 3D compressible Euler flow", preprint (2022), arXiv:2207.07107, https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.07107
  23. Dongxiao Yu, "Modified Wave Operators for a Scalar Quasilinear Wave Equation Satisfying the Weak Null Condition", Communications in Mathematical Physics 382 (2021), no. 3, pp. 1961–2013, doi:10.1007/s00220-021-03989-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-03989-0, preprint arXiv:2002.05355, https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.05355
  24. Dongxiao Yu, "Asymptotic Completeness for a Scalar Quasilinear Wave Equation Satisfying the Weak Null Condition", Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 298 (2024), no. 1492, doi:10.1090/memo/1492, https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1492, preprint arXiv:2105.11573, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11573
  25. Louie Bernhardt, Volker Schlue, and Dongxiao Yu, "John's blow up examples and scattering solutions for semi-linear wave equations", preprint (2024), arXiv:2404.12878, https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12878
  26. Nikodem Szpak, "Asymptotics from Scaling for Nonlinear Wave Equations", Communications in Partial Differential Equations 35 (2010), no. 10, pp. 1876–1890, doi:10.1080/03605300903540935, https://doi.org/10.1080/03605300903540935
  27. Demetrios Christodoulou, "On the development of shocks in fluids", Journal of Mathematical Physics 63 (2022), no. 9, Article 091102, doi:10.1063/5.0075767, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0075767