A 30-year meta-analysis of homework and achievement in mathematics and science (Fan, Xu, Cai, He and Fan, 2017) found a weak positive overall association but ended with a set of explicitly unresolved questions: the evidence at early elementary grades was too thin (especially for science), student gender could not be tested as a moderator because too few primary studies reported gender-separated correlations, moderator analyses for specific homework assignment features (type, complexity, purpose) were impossible, and the English-language-only inclusion left generalizability uncertain. Later syntheses (TIMSS-based meta-analysis 2022; Campbell systematic review 2024) and primary studies have added grade-8 and cross-country evidence, but those syntheses could not themselves test the gender and assignment-feature moderators and found experimental evidence on homework dose, particularly for young children, nearly absent. The problem is to determine, with adequate primary evidence and an updated synthesis, the direction and magnitude of the homework-achievement relationship in the early elementary grades and how it is moderated by student gender, assignment features, and national/language context.

Background

Homework is the set of tasks assigned by teachers to be completed during non-school hours; educational researchers distinguish several homework indicators, namely measures of the assignment itself (amount or frequency of assigned homework), measures of student behavior (time spent, completion rate, effort), and qualitative features of the assignment (its type, complexity, and purpose, such as practice, preparation, or exam drilling). Establishing whether and how these indicators relate to academic achievement is a long-standing question in educational psychology and educational effectiveness research, with direct policy consequences for homework rules in the early grades. A meta-analysis statistically pools effect sizes (correlations rr or standardized mean differences such as Hedges' gg) across primary studies, and a moderator analysis tests whether the pooled association differs across subgroups (for example, grade levels, subjects, or countries) using between-group heterogeneity tests. Earlier syntheses in this lineage, notably Cooper, Robinson and Patall (2006), pooled mostly US studies of homework time; Fan, Xu, Cai, He and Fan (2017) extended this to mathematics and science achievement over 1986-2015, differentiating homework indicators, and reported weak positive associations (on the order of r≈.21r \approx .21 for mathematics and r≈.23r \approx .23 for science as later citing work summarizes them) with substantial moderation, for example a weaker association for Asian than for US samples. Their synthesis, however, was restricted to English-language publications, and its moderator tests broke down exactly where the policy debate is sharpest: too few correlations existed for young children (early elementary grades, roughly ages 6-9, especially in science), gender-separated correlations were almost never reported by primary studies, and assignment features such as type, complexity, and purpose were too sparsely coded to analyze. Subsequent large-scale work has used international assessment data (TIMSS, the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study, a recurring cross-national survey of fourth- and eighth-grade students) and quasi-experimental designs such as twin fixed-effects models (comparing identical twins who differ in homework time to control for shared family background) to attack parts of the question, but, as detailed below, the field's own syntheses state that the moderator questions for young children remain open.

Problem Statement

Determine, with adequate primary evidence and an updated synthesis, the homework-achievement relationship in the early elementary grades and its moderators. Specifically: (i) what are the direction and magnitude of the associations between each homework indicator (amount and frequency of assignment, time spent, completion, effort) and mathematics and science achievement for students in the early elementary grades, where Fan et al. (2017) found the evidence too thin, especially for science; (ii) is the association moderated by student gender, which requires primary studies reporting gender-separated homework-achievement statistics or individual-level data; (iii) how do assignment features, the type, complexity, and purpose of the assigned homework, moderate the association; and (iv) do these conclusions hold beyond English-language research populations, given that both Fan et al. (2017) and the later TIMSS-based and Campbell syntheses were constrained by language coverage or data availability? Associational (correlational) effect sizes are admissible evidence for every sub-question; causal-identification designs (experimental, quasi-experimental such as twin or sibling fixed-effects, or longitudinal designs tracing homework across grade transitions) are required only for causal claims about the effect of homework dose on achievement. A sub-question is resolved on the evidence when the admissible primary studies supply usable estimates for it, a moderator being treated as estimable once at least two independent eligible samples contribute usable effect sizes and otherwise as not yet testable. A sub-question is treated as not yet testable only when a post-2017 search for eligible primary studies shows that no usable estimate can be derived for it.

References

  1. Fan, H., Xu, J., Cai, Z., He, J., & Fan, X. (2017). Homework and students' achievement in math and science: A 30-year meta-analysis, 1986-2015. Educational Research Review, 20, 35-54. DOI 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.003
  2. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62. DOI 10.3102/00346543076001001. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001001
  3. Ozyildirim, G. (2022). Time spent on homework and academic achievement: A meta-analysis study related to results of TIMSS. Psicología Educativa, 28(1), 13-21. DOI 10.5093/psed2021a30. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a30
  4. Jerrim, J., Lopez-Agudo, L. A., & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D. (2019). The relationship between homework and the academic progress of children in Spain during compulsory elementary education: A twin fixed-effects approach. British Educational Research Journal, 45(5), 1021-1049. DOI 10.1002/berj.3549. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3549
  5. Dolean, D. D., & Lervåg, A. (2022). Variations of homework amount assigned in elementary school can impact academic achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 90(2), 280-296. DOI 10.1080/00220973.2020.1861422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1861422
  6. Sun, M., Du, J., & Xu, J. (2021). Are homework purposes and student achievement reciprocally related? A longitudinal study. Current Psychology, 40(10), 4945-4956. DOI 10.1007/s12144-019-00447-y. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00447-y
  7. Guo, L., Li, J., Xu, Z., Hu, X., Liu, C., Xing, X., Li, X., White, H., & Yang, K. (2024). The relationship between homework time and academic performance among K-12: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(3), e1431. DOI 10.1002/cl2.1431. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1431
  8. Turan Ozpolat, E., Karakoc, B., Yildirim, I., & Eryilmaz, K. (2023). The effect of homework on student achievement: A meta-analysis study. Croatian Journal of Education, 25(3). DOI 10.15516/cje.v25i3.4695. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v25i3.4695
  9. Xu, J., Guo, S., Feng, Y., Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., Núñez, J. C., & Fan, H. (2024). Parental homework involvement and students' achievement: A three-level meta-analysis. Psicothema, 36(1), 1-14. DOI 10.7334/psicothema2023.92. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.92
  10. Flannery, D., Palcic, D., & Clavel, J. G. (2026). Who benefits from the assignment of homework? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. Advance online publication. DOI 10.1111/obes.70119. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.70119
  11. Zhang, M., Shao, Y., & Liu, J. (2026). How mathematics homework types relate to mathematics academic performance via interest? A chain mediation analysis in the Chinese context. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1815534. DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1815534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1815534