Aberration-corrected transmission electron microscopy at 80 keV directly visualized fullerene cages forming from graphene flakes by a top-down, surface-mediated route (edge-atom loss, pentagon nucleation, curving, and zipping). Whether, and to what extent, this channel contributes to fullerene production in arc discharge, laser ablation, and pyrolysis — where fullerenes actually form in high yield — remains quantitatively unresolved. The problem is to determine the relative contribution of the top-down surface-mediated channel and the bottom-up gas-phase assembly channel under standard preparative conditions, as a function of controllable synthesis parameters, together with the elementary kinetics and substrate-coupling terms needed to predict size-dependent cage-closure yields.

Background

Fullerenes are closed-cage carbon molecules of which the archetypal example is buckminsterfullerene, C60\mathrm{C}_{60}, a soccer-ball-shaped cage of 20 hexagons and 12 pentagons. They are produced in high yield by arc discharge (an electric arc between graphite electrodes in an inert helium atmosphere) and by pyrolysis of carbon-containing precursors, and are also formed by laser ablation of graphite. Despite more than three decades of study, the mechanism by which some sixty to a few hundred carbon atoms assemble into these highly symmetric cages is not settled. The classical picture is bottom-up: graphite vaporizes to small fragments such as C2\mathrm{C}_2 units that coalesce into chains and rings and build the cage atom by atom; well-known variants include the 'pentagon road', 'fullerene road', 'ring coalescence', and the 'shrinking hot giant' model (in which large cages form first and shrink by C2\mathrm{C}_2 loss). In 2010, Chuvilin, Kaiser, Bichoutskaia, Besley and Khlobystov used aberration-corrected transmission electron microscopy (TEM, an imaging technique that resolves individual atoms; here operated at 80 keV electron energy) to watch single fullerene cages form in real time from small graphene flakes lying on a graphite substrate. Density functional theory (DFT, the standard quantum-chemical method for ground-state energetics) modeling supported a four-step top-down mechanism: (i) loss of edge carbon atoms, (ii) formation of pentagons at the edge, (iii) curving of the flake into a bowl, and (iv) zipping-up of the open edges into a closed cage; imperfect cages can afterwards anneal by Stone–Wales rearrangements (a bond-rotation defect migration that converts neighboring pentagon–hexagon arrangements and rearranges the cage topology). Crucially, the TEM conditions differ from preparative ones: there is no direct heating, the environment is high vacuum rather than a helium buffer gas (a quenching atmosphere that cools hot carbon species), and the energy that breaks bonds comes from the electron beam rather than a plasma or laser. The authors themselves posed the central question: 'Could these TEM observations be relevant to real-life fullerene production methods, such as arc discharge or laser ablation of graphite?' They noted that the two mechanisms may coexist — in arc discharge, some fullerenes may form in the gas phase from C2\mathrm{C}_2 fragments while others may form on the graphite electrode surface from small graphene flakes — and that a laser-ablation experiment had shown fullerene yield to depend critically on the orientation and quality of the graphitic surface. Their DFT treatment covered only a single exemplified flake (initially 117 carbon atoms, followed through reductions to 86 and 84 atoms), leaving the elementary kinetics and the coupling to the substrate (which absorbs the energy released in bond formation, much as a buffer gas would) unquantified.

Problem Statement

Determine quantitatively how fullerene formation under standard preparative conditions — arc discharge, laser ablation of graphite, and pyrolysis — is partitioned between (a) the top-down, surface-mediated channel in which small graphene flakes on a carbon surface lose edge atoms, nucleate pentagons, curve, and zip up into closed cages, as directly observed under 80 keV electron irradiation in transmission electron microscopy, and (b) bottom-up gas-phase assembly from small fragments such as C2\mathrm{C}_2. Specifically: (i) establish the relative contribution of each channel to the observed fullerene product distribution (size, isomer, and yield) as a function of controllable experimental parameters — temperature, buffer-gas identity and pressure, electrode or target surface quality and orientation, and the flux of energetic species; and (ii) supply the elementary kinetics for the top-down steps (edge-atom loss, pentagon nucleation, curving, zipping, and Stone–Wales-mediated annealing), together with the substrate-coupling terms describing energy dissipation into the support, sufficient to predict size-dependent probabilities of cage closure in these environments. The three named routes and the four listed parameter axes delimit the class of standard preparative conditions in scope. Across this class, the channel-resolved contributions to fullerene size, isomer and yield, together with the elementary top-down kinetics and substrate-coupling terms, should form a quantitative model whose parametric dependences can be confronted with measured preparative fullerene yields.

References

  1. A. Chuvilin, U. Kaiser, E. Bichoutskaia, N. A. Besley, A. N. Khlobystov, 'Direct transformation of graphene to fullerene', Nature Chemistry 2:450–453 (2010), DOI 10.1038/nchem.644, https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.644
  2. J. Zhang, F. L. Bowles, D. W. Bearden, W. K. Ray, T. Fuhrer, Y. Ye, C. Dixon, K. Harich, R. F. Helm, M. M. Olmstead, A. L. Balch, H. C. Dorn, 'A missing link in the transformation from asymmetric to symmetric metallofullerene cages implies a top-down fullerene formation mechanism', Nature Chemistry 5:880–885 (2013), DOI 10.1038/nchem.1748, https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1748
  3. W. Cai, F.-F. Li, L. Bao, Y. Xie, X. Lu, 'Isolation and Crystallographic Characterization of La2C2@Cs(574)-C102 and La2C2@C2(816)-C104: Evidence for the Top-Down Formation Mechanism of Fullerenes', Journal of the American Chemical Society 138:6670–6675 (2016), DOI 10.1021/jacs.6b03934, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b03934
  4. P. W. Dunk, M. Mulet-Gas, Y. Nakanishi, N. K. Kaiser, A. Rodríguez-Fortea, H. Shinohara, J. M. Poblet, A. G. Marshall, H. W. Kroto, 'Bottom-up formation of endohedral mono-metallofullerenes is directed by charge transfer', Nature Communications 5:5844 (2014), DOI 10.1038/ncomms6844, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6844
  5. M. Mulet-Gas, L. Abella, M. R. Cerón, E. Castro, A. G. Marshall, A. Rodríguez-Fortea, L. Echegoyen, J. M. Poblet, P. W. Dunk, 'Transformation of doped graphite into cluster-encapsulated fullerene cages', Nature Communications 8:1222 (2017), DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01295-9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01295-9
  6. J. Y. Han, T. S. Choi, S. Kim, J. W. Lee, Y. Ha, K. S. Jeong, H. Kim, H. C. Choi, H. I. Kim, 'Probing Distinct Fullerene Formation Processes from Carbon Precursors of Different Sizes and Structures', Analytical Chemistry 88:8232–8238 (2016), DOI 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02076, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02076
  7. H.-J. Qian, Y. Wang, K. Morokuma, 'Quantum mechanical simulation reveals the role of cold helium atoms and the coexistence of bottom-up and top-down formation mechanisms of buckminsterfullerene from carbon vapor', Carbon 114:635–641 (2017), DOI 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.062, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.062
  8. F. Pietrucci, W. Andreoni, 'Fate of a Graphene Flake: A New Route toward Fullerenes Disclosed with Ab Initio Simulations', Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10:913–917 (2014), DOI 10.1021/ct401103p, https://doi.org/10.1021/ct401103p
  9. A. S. Sinitsa, I. V. Lebedeva, A. M. Popov, A. A. Knizhnik, 'Transformation of Amorphous Carbon Clusters to Fullerenes', The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121:13396–13404 (2017), DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04030, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04030
  10. A. M. Popov, I. V. Lebedeva, S. A. Vyrko, N. A. Poklonski, 'Multiscale modeling strategy to solve fullerene formation mystery', Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures 29:755–766 (2021), DOI 10.1080/1536383X.2021.1900124, https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2021.1900124
  11. M. Li, Y. Zhao, Y. Han, K. Yuan, S. Nagase, M. Ehara, X. Zhao, 'Theoretical Investigation of the Key Roles in Fullerene-Formation Mechanisms: Enantiomer and Enthalpy', ACS Applied Nano Materials 3:547–554 (2020), DOI 10.1021/acsanm.9b02110, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b02110
  12. I. Mitchell, L. Qiu, A. Page, L. D. Lamb, F. Ding, 'Role of Graphitic Bowls in Temperature Dependent Fullerene Formation', The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 126:8955–8963 (2022), DOI 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c05855, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c05855
  13. A. S. Sinitsa, Yu. G. Polynskaya, N. A. Matsokin, Ye. M. Kedalo, A. A. Knizhnik, A. M. Popov, 'Formation of the icosahedral C60 fullerene via migration of single sp atoms and annihilation of sp-atom pairs', Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 26:21905–21911 (2024), DOI 10.1039/d4cp02490g, https://doi.org/10.1039/d4cp02490g
  14. J. Zhen, P. Castellanos, D. M. Paardekooper, H. Linnartz, A. G. G. M. Tielens, 'Laboratory Formation of Fullerenes from PAHs: Top-Down Interstellar Chemistry', The Astrophysical Journal Letters 797:L30 (2014), DOI 10.1088/2041-8205/797/2/L30, https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/797/2/L30
  15. O. Berné, J. Montillaud, C. Joblin, 'Top-down formation of fullerenes in the interstellar medium', Astronomy & Astrophysics 577:A133 (2015), DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/201425338, https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425338
  16. B. Wu, L. Jiang, Y. Luo, C. Wang, 'The Effect of the Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon in the Formation of Fullerenes', Angewandte Chemie International Edition 59:3942–3947 (2020), DOI 10.1002/anie.201915228, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201915228
  17. D. Lungerich, H. Hoelzel, K. Harano, N. Jux, K. Yu. Amsharov, E. Nakamura, 'A Singular Molecule-to-Molecule Transformation on Video: The Bottom-Up Synthesis of Fullerene C60 from Truxene Derivative C60H30', ACS Nano 15:12804–12814 (2021), DOI 10.1021/acsnano.1c02222, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c02222
  18. H. Hoelzel, S. Lee, K. Yu. Amsharov, N. Jux, K. Harano, E. Nakamura, D. Lungerich, 'Time-resolved imaging and analysis of the electron beam-induced formation of an open-cage metallo-azafullerene', Nature Chemistry 15:1444–1451 (2023), DOI 10.1038/s41557-023-01261-7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01261-7
  19. Y. Hou, X. Kong, 'Endometallofullerenes in the Gas Phase: Progress and Prospect', Inorganics 12:68 (2024), DOI 10.3390/inorganics12030068, https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12030068
  20. G. G. C. Soares, K. Rigolo, D. Dini, J. M. Rosolen, 'Self-assembly graphene into fullerenes and hollow spherical graphene particles during anodic polarization of graphite', Diamond and Related Materials 156:112379 (2025), DOI 10.1016/j.diamond.2025.112379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2025.112379
  21. D. Wu, X. Liu, Y. Li, H. Ying, H. Zhang, L. Huo, C. Cui, Z. Shi, S.-C. Lin, S.-Y. Xie, L.-S. Zheng, 'Revealing the chlorine-mediated mechanism of fullerene pyrolysis synthesis by in situ mass spectrometry monitoring', Science China Chemistry 69:1846–1853 (2026), DOI 10.1007/s11426-025-2977-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-025-2977-3