During biological wastewater treatment, trace organic micropollutants (MPs) are removed in part by nitrifying activated sludge (NAS), but it matters decisively which organisms and enzymes do the work. Men et al. (2017) showed that the widely used inhibitor allylthiourea (ATU) suppressed the biotransformation of many MPs more strongly than the ammonia-monooxygenase-specific inhibitor 1-octyne, revealing that unidentified, non-ammonia-monooxygenase (non-AMO), ATU-affected enzymes in non-ammonia-oxidizing community members contribute to MP removal; copper-dependent oxidoreductases (copper-containing nitrite reductases, multicopper oxidases, laccases) were proposed as candidates but never confirmed. Later work has established the in-vitro plausibility of multicopper oxidases, the presence and activity of heterotrophic degraders inside nitrifying communities, and correlation-based taxon assignment for a single compound (atenolol), while a published 2021 controversy over the role of ammonia oxidation in micropollutant transformation remains unsettled. The causal, enzyme- and taxon-resolved attribution of non-AMO MP biotransformation in NAS, and its generality across wastewater treatment plants and operating conditions, remains open.

Background

Biological wastewater treatment removes not only bulk organic matter and nitrogen but also trace organic micropollutants (MPs) — pharmaceuticals, pesticides, personal-care products and industrial chemicals present at microgram-per-liter and lower concentrations. An important removal process is microbial biotransformation by the activated-sludge community. Attention has long focused on nitrifiers: ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB, e.g., Nitrosomonas) oxidize ammonia to hydroxylamine and nitrite using ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), a copper-containing membrane enzyme whose broad substrate promiscuity lets it co-oxidize non-growth substrates, a process called cometabolism. Ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and, since their 2015 discovery, complete-ammonia-oxidizing (comammox) Nitrospira bacteria, which oxidize ammonia all the way to nitrate, broaden the nitrifier guild in treatment plants. Because MP removal often correlates with nitrification performance, inhibitor experiments are the standard tool for attributing MP removal to nitrifiers. Allylthiourea (ATU) blocks AMO by chelating copper, but because many enzymes besides AMO depend on copper, ATU is not specific. Taylor et al. (2013) established that short-chain 1-alkynes such as 1-octyne irreversibly inactivate bacterial AMO while leaving archaeal AMO unaffected, providing a more selective mechanistic probe.

Men et al. (2017) compared ATU and 1-octyne side by side in batch experiments with a nitrifying activated sludge (NAS) community from a Swiss full-scale plant, following 79 structurally diverse MPs at 8 µg/L each. AOB activity (via AMO) accounted for roughly 50–90% of the removal of asulam, clomazone, monuron and trimethoprim, established by octyne inhibition followed by recovery of removal once AMO was resynthesized. However, for 17 of the 31 inhibited MPs, ATU inhibited removal more than 1.5-fold more strongly than octyne; for chlortoluron, amisulpride, carbendazim and tebufenozide the ATU effect clearly exceeded the AMO-specific effect, so non-AOB community members with ATU-affected, non-AMO enzymes contributed measurably to MP biotransformation. Because ATU acts by copper chelation, and because — as the authors noted in their discussion, citing an earlier metatranscriptomic survey of full-scale wastewater treatment plant communities (Johnson et al. 2015) — transcripts of copper-containing nitrite reductases (NirK, the periplasmic copper enzyme that reduces nitrite to nitric oxide during denitrification) occur in such communities at abundances comparable to AMO transcripts, the authors proposed copper-dependent oxidoreductases — copper-containing nitrite reductases, multicopper oxidases (a family of multi-copper redox enzymes that oxidize phenols and aromatic amines), or laccases (phenol-oxidizing multicopper enzymes) — as candidate enzymes, while stating explicitly that direct confirmation by enzyme assays or targeted proteomics was lacking. Bulk heterotrophic activity (chemical oxygen demand removal and carbon-source utilization) was largely unaffected by ATU, indicating that the affected enzymes are peripheral to central heterotrophic metabolism rather than essential for it. The study concluded that ATU-only designs systematically over-attribute MP removal to AOB and recommended 1-alkyne-based inhibitor designs instead.

Three coupled uncertainties follow from this result and from the paper's own caveats. First, the molecular identities and taxonomic sources of the ATU-affected non-AMO enzymes are unknown. Second, it is unknown how far the compound-specific attribution pattern generalizes across wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) communities and operating conditions — community composition, the relative abundance of AOB, AOA and comammox, ammonium availability, redox regime and initial MP concentration all plausibly shift which organisms and pathways dominate — and whether the additive decomposition of removal into AOB, ATU-affected non-AOB and unaffected fractions, which assumes no indirect ecological dependencies among these groups, is valid. Third, unambiguous linkage of transformation products (TPs) to specific taxa remains constrained by low TP concentrations and missing reference standards. Subsequent work has made the attribution problem sharper, not easier: nitrite-oxidizing Nitrobacter pure cultures transformed none of a tested MP set while hydroxylamine (an AMO product) abiotically transforms several MPs (Yu et al. 2018), abiotic nitrite chemistry nitrates diclofenac in nitrifying sludge (Wu et al. 2019), and comammox Nitrospira transform a distinct MP spectrum including carbendazim (Han et al. 2019, 2023) — one of the four compounds Men et al. attributed to non-AOB, ATU-affected enzymes.

Problem Statement

Determine, with direct experimental evidence, which enzymes — and which member taxa of nitrifying activated sludge communities encode and express them — catalyze the non-AMO (i.e., not mediated by the ammonia-oxidizer enzyme ammonia monooxygenase, AMO), ATU-sensitive (i.e., suppressed by the copper chelator allylthiourea, ATU) micropollutant biotransformations identified by Men et al. (2017), with the paradigm compounds chlortoluron, amisulpride, carbendazim and tebufenozide. Specifically: (i) identify the responsible enzyme families; (ii) assign the responsible enzymes to their host taxa within the community; (iii) establish whether the ATU-sensitive loss of removal reflects direct enzyme inhibition or indirect ecological dependencies among community members (e.g., heterotroph or nitrite-oxidizer dependence on ammonia-oxidizer activity), thereby validating or correcting the additive decomposition of removal; (iv) identify transformation products at sufficient coverage to link biotransformation pathways to specific taxa; and (v) determine how far the compound-specific attribution pattern generalizes across diverse wastewater treatment plant communities and operating conditions (community composition; the relative abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, AOB; ammonia-oxidizing archaea, AOA; and complete-ammonia-oxidizing, comammox, Nitrospira; ammonium availability; redox regime; initial micropollutant concentration), characterizing the pattern over a bounded, explicitly justified set of community compositions and operating conditions rather than exhaustively. The five components (i)–(v) are jointly, not alternatively, posed.

References

  1. Men, Yujie; Achermann, Stefan; Helbling, Damian E.; Johnson, David R.; Fenner, Kathrin (2017). Relative contribution of ammonia oxidizing bacteria and other members of nitrifying activated sludge communities to micropollutant biotransformation. Water Research 109:217–226. DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.048, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.048
  2. Taylor, A. E.; Vajrala, N.; Giguere, A. T.; Gitelman, A. I.; Arp, D. J.; Myrold, D. D.; Sayavedra-Soto, L.; Bottomley, P. J. (2013). Use of aliphatic n-alkynes to discriminate soil nitrification activities of ammonia-oxidizing thaumarchaea and bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79(21):6544–6551. DOI 10.1128/AEM.01928-13, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01928-13
  3. Johnson, David R.; Helbling, Damian E.; Lee, Tae Kwon; Park, Joonhong; Fenner, Kathrin; Kohler, Hans-Peter E.; Ackermann, Martin (2015). Association of biodiversity with the rates of micropollutant biotransformations among full-scale wastewater treatment plant communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81(2):666–675. DOI 10.1128/aem.03286-14, https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03286-14
  4. Yu, Yaochun; Han, Ping; Zhou, Li-Jun; Li, Zhong; Wagner, Michael; Men, Yujie (2018). Ammonia monooxygenase-mediated cometabolic biotransformation and hydroxylamine-mediated abiotic transformation of micropollutants in an AOB/NOB coculture. Environmental Science & Technology 52(16):9196–9205. DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b02801, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02801
  5. Achermann, Stefan; Falås, Per; Joss, Adriano; Mansfeldt, Cresten B.; Men, Yujie; Vogler, Bernadette; Fenner, Kathrin (2018). Trends in micropollutant biotransformation along a solids retention time gradient. Environmental Science & Technology 52(20):11601–11611. DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b02763, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02763
  6. Kassotaki, Elissavet; Pijuan, Maite; Joss, Adriano; Borrego, Carles M.; Rodriguez-Roda, Ignasi; Buttiglieri, Gianluigi (2018). Unraveling the potential of a combined nitritation-anammox biomass towards the biodegradation of pharmaceutically active compounds. Science of the Total Environment 624:722–731. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.116
  7. Wu, Gang; Geng, Jinju; Li, Shengnan; Li, Juechun; Fu, Yingying; Xu, Ke; Ren, Hongqiang; Zhang, Xuxiang (2019). Abiotic and biotic processes of diclofenac in enriched nitrifying sludge: Kinetics, transformation products and reactions. Science of the Total Environment 683:80–88. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.216
  8. Sun, Haohao; Narihiro, Takashi; Ma, Xueyan; Zhang, Xu-Xiang; Ren, Hongqiang; Ye, Lin (2019). Diverse aromatic-degrading bacteria present in a highly enriched autotrophic nitrifying sludge. Science of the Total Environment 666:245–251. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.172
  9. Han, Ping; Yu, Yaochun; Zhou, Lijun; Tian, Zhenyu; Li, Zhong; Hou, Lijun; Liu, Min; Wu, Qinglong; Wagner, Michael; Men, Yujie (2019). Specific micropollutant biotransformation pattern by the comammox bacterium Nitrospira inopinata. Environmental Science & Technology 53(15):8695–8705. DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b01037, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01037
  10. Su, Qingxian; Schittich, Anna-Ricarda; Jensen, Marlene Mark; Ng, Howyong; Smets, Barth F. (2021). Role of ammonia oxidation in organic micropollutant transformation during wastewater treatment: Insights from molecular, cellular, and community level observations. Environmental Science & Technology 55(4):2173–2188. DOI 10.1021/acs.est.0c06466, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06466
  11. Fenner, Kathrin; Men, Yujie (2021). Comment on "Role of Ammonia Oxidation in Organic Micropollutant Transformation during Wastewater Treatment": Overlooked Evidence to the Contrary. Environmental Science & Technology 55(17):12128–12129. DOI 10.1021/acs.est.1c04178, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04178
  12. Su, Qingxian; Schittich, Anna-Ricarda; Smets, Barth F. (2021). Response to "Comment on 'Role of Ammonia Oxidation in Organic Micropollutant Transformation during Wastewater Treatment': Overlooked Evidence to the Contrary". Environmental Science & Technology 55(24):16783–16784. DOI 10.1021/acs.est.1c05941, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05941
  13. Kennes-Veiga, David M.; Vogler, Bernadette; Fenner, Kathrin; Carballa, Marta; Lema, Juan M. (2021). Heterotrophic enzymatic biotransformations of organic micropollutants in activated sludge. Science of the Total Environment 780:146564. DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146564, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146564
  14. Fenner, Kathrin; Elsner, Martin; Lueders, Tillmann; McLachlan, Michael S.; Wackett, Lawrence P.; Zimmermann, Michael; Drewes, Jörg E. (2021). Methodological advances to study contaminant biotransformation: New prospects for understanding and reducing environmental persistence? ACS ES&T Water 1(7):1541–1554. DOI 10.1021/acsestwater.1c00025, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.1c00025
  15. Athanasakoglou, Anastasia; Fenner, Kathrin (2022). Toward characterizing the genetic basis of trace organic contaminant biotransformation in activated sludge: The role of multicopper oxidases as a case study. Environmental Science & Technology 56(1):313–324. DOI 10.1021/acs.est.1c05803, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05803
  16. Sheng, Qi; Yi, Ming; Men, Yujie; Lu, Huijie (2021). Cometabolism of 17α-ethynylestradiol by nitrifying bacteria depends on reducing power availability and leads to elevated nitric oxide formation. Environment International 153:106528. DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106528, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106528
  17. Kennes-Veiga, David M.; González-Gil, Lorena; Carballa, Marta; Lema, Juan M. (2022). Enzymatic cometabolic biotransformation of organic micropollutants in wastewater treatment plants: A review. Bioresource Technology 344:126291. DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126291
  18. Zhao, Jian; Fang, Shangbiao; Liu, Gang; Qi, Weixiao; Bai, Yaohui; Liu, Huijuan; Qu, Jiuhui (2022). Role of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms in the removal of organic micropollutants during simulated riverbank filtration. Water Research 226:119250. DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.119250
  19. Guo, Ning; Liu, Mengmeng; Yang, Zhuhui; Wu, Daoji; Chen, Feiyong; Wang, Jinhe; Zhu, Zhaoliang; Wang, Lin (2023). The synergistic mechanism of β-lactam antibiotic removal between ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms and heterotrophs. Environmental Research 216:114419. DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114419, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114419
  20. Rios-Miguel, Ana B.; van Bergen, Tamara J. H. M.; Zillien, Caterina; Ragas, Ad M. J.; van Zelm, Rosalie; Jetten, Mike S. M.; Hendriks, A. Jan; Welte, Claudia U. (2023). Predicting and improving the microbial removal of organic micropollutants during wastewater treatment: A review. Chemosphere 333:138908. DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138908
  21. Han, Ping; Rios-Miguel, Ana B.; Tang, Xiufeng; Yu, Yaochun; Zhou, Li-Jun; Hou, Lijun; Liu, Min; Sun, Dongyao; Jetten, Mike S. M.; Welte, Claudia U.; Men, Yujie; Lücker, Sebastian (2023). Benzimidazole fungicide biotransformation by comammox Nitrospira bacteria: Transformation pathways and associated proteomic responses. Journal of Hazardous Materials 445:130558. DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130558, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130558
  22. Seller-Brison, Carolin; Brison, Antoine; Yu, Yaochun; Robinson, Serina L.; Fenner, Kathrin (2024). Adaptation towards catabolic biodegradation of trace organic contaminants in activated sludge. Water Research 266:122431. DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122431
  23. Elad, Tal; Tang, Kai; Pierrelée, Michaël; Jensen, Marlene Mark; Bentzon-Tilia, Mikkel; Smets, Barth F.; Dechesne, Arnaud; Valverde-Pérez, Borja (2025). An integrated meta-omics approach for identifying candidate organic micropollutant degraders in complex microbial communities. Water Research 286:124217 (preprint: bioRxiv 10.1101/2025.02.21.639455). DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2025.124217, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124217