Electrochemically modulated liquid-liquid extraction (EMLLE) exploits the Galvani potential difference at the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) to drive and switch the transfer of ionized molecules, offering potential-based selectivity in sample preparation. Collins, Berduque and Arrigan (Anal. Chem. 2008) demonstrated proof-of-principle selective EMLLE of two cationic beta-blockers (propranolol, timolol) from artificial urine into an organogel phase, but with only about 10% extraction efficiency and with the less lipophilic drug sotalol excluded entirely: endogenous urine ions (creatinine, K+, Na+, NH4+) truncate the available interfacial potential window and mask analyte transfers at more positive potentials. Later work resolved part of the problem - a 2019 common-ion (tetramethylammonium) controlled EMLLE with pH-swing back-extraction reaches nearly 100% extraction efficiency and 60-fold enrichment for biguanide cations - but only from clean solutions or urine diluted several-fold, and the 2019 potentiostatic data confirm that highly hydrophilic drug transfer still overlaps creatinine transfer at the edge of the matrix-truncated window. The surviving open core is quantitative, selective EMLLE of ionized drugs directly from undiluted physiological matrices, including drugs whose formal transfer potentials lie beyond the matrix-truncated window, embodied in a cell or flow configuration compatible with routine analytical preprocessing.

Background

When an aqueous electrolyte phase contacts an immiscible organic electrolyte phase, the boundary forms a polarizable interface known as the interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES). Applying an electrical potential difference across it - the Galvani potential difference, denoted Δowϕ\Delta_\mathrm{o}^{\mathrm{w}}\phi between the organic (o) and water (w) phases - can drive the transfer of an ion from one phase to the other, in the same way that an electrode potential drives electron transfer. Each ion has a formal transfer potential set by its Gibbs energy of transfer (roughly, its lipophilicity, often summarized by the octanol-water partition constant log⁡P\log P); ion-transfer voltammetry at the ITIES records these transfers as current peaks, and an ion crosses the interface only when the applied potential is driven beyond its transfer potential. Because different ions transfer at different potentials, the ITIES offers a route to selective, electrochemically switchable liquid-liquid extraction (EMLLE): choose a potential and only ions whose transfer potentials are exceeded are extracted. The accessible potential range is not unlimited, however. The window of polarizability is bounded at either end by the transfer of the supporting electrolyte ions, and in a multicomponent sample every endogenous ion with an intermediate transfer potential truncates the usable window further, transferring (and coextracting) before more hydrophilic target analytes can be reached.

Collins, Berduque and Arrigan (2008) tested whether this concept survives contact with a realistic biological matrix. Using a flow cell in which aqueous artificial urine passed over a 1,2-dichloroethane organogel (an organic phase gelled with polymer to stabilize the interface), they showed by cyclic voltammetry that the artificial-urine components (including creatinine, K+, Na+ and NH4+) shorten the available potential window, that the cationic beta-blocker drugs propranolol and timolol transfer within the remaining window and can be selectively extracted by applying potentials positive of their formal transfer potentials, but that sotalol - a beta-blocker of the same therapeutic class but substantially more hydrophilic - could not be transferred at all within the window, its transfer being masked by the transfer of endogenous ions. The measured extraction efficiency was only about 10% of the injected analyte, a limitation traced to the low interfacial area-to-volume ratio and diffusion-limited mass transport of the cell. Improving recovery through alternative cell designs, interfacial geometries or flow configurations was explicitly named as required future work in the subsequent EMLLE literature - Jajuli et al. (J. Phys. Sci. 2019) conclude that 'different cell design must be investigated in the future'. Robustness of the selectivity across the physiological ranges of urine pH and ionic strength, quantitative management of the trade-off between target selectivity and coextraction of matrix ions, and scaling of the technique into a practical analytical preprocessing step remain open.

Subsequent literature developed three partially independent lines. First, the detection line: silicon-membrane microinterface arrays and nanoscopic ITIES arrays (silica nanochannel membranes) were used to detect beta-blockers and other ionized drugs in human urine, serum and whole blood, but with samples diluted 100- to 1000-fold, so the physiological-matrix window problem is diluted away rather than solved, and detection is not extraction. Second, the cell-design and mechanistic line: hydrodynamic cells, supported liquid membranes under polarization control, microfluidic EMLLE chips and droplet-based Galvani-potential-modulated microextraction studied mass transport and voltage-controlled distribution. Third, the extraction-efficiency line: Jajuli, Hébrant, Herzog and coworkers replaced the externally polarized cell with a potentiostat-free common-ion strategy, in which the distribution of tetramethylammonium (TMA+) between the phases fixes Δowϕ\Delta_\mathrm{o}^{\mathrm{w}}\phi by a Nernst-type relation, combined with a pH-swing two-step extraction/back-extraction; this reached nearly 100% extraction efficiency and 60-fold enrichment for three biguanide cations including the highly hydrophilic metformin (log⁡P≈−2.6\log P \approx -2.6). Crucially, however, that demonstration required clean laboratory solutions or urine diluted 1:4 to 1:10 to minimize matrix effects, and the same group's potentiostatic study in artificial urine showed metformin transfer still overlapping creatinine transfer at the very edge of the truncated window. No later study has extracted a sotalol-class (window-blocked) drug selectively from a full-strength physiological matrix, nor systematically mapped EMLLE selectivity and recovery across physiological urine pH and ionic strength.

Problem Statement

The open problem is to make electrochemically modulated liquid-liquid extraction (EMLLE) a quantitative and selective sample-preparation method for ionized drugs directly in full-strength physiological matrices, extending the 2008 proof-of-principle of Collins, Berduque and Arrigan past its demonstrated limits. The objective is a validated EMLLE method that extracts a target ionized drug from a multicomponent physiological matrix (artificial or real urine at physiological concentration, not diluted to minimize matrix effects) with the selectivity and recovery expected of a routine analytical sample-preparation technique. Concretely, the usable interfacial potential window in the physiological matrix must be extended far enough that at least one drug class whose formal transfer potential is masked by endogenous ion transfers in the original configuration (creatinine, K+, Na+, NH4+ truncating the window; sotalol is the 2008 exemplar, metformin's edge-overlapping transfer the 2019 one) can be selectively extracted directly from the full-strength matrix, with quantitative recovery suitable for analytical sample preparation, embodied in a cell or flow configuration whose mass-transport and interfacial-area design is compatible with practical analytical preprocessing volumes. The problem is answered when such selective, quantitative extraction has been demonstrated for at least one previously window-blocked ionized drug in an undiluted physiological matrix. Partial demonstrations - efficiency gains confined to clean or diluted matrices, detection in diluted biofluids, or cell/flow engineering without extension of the matrix-truncated window - resolve individual strands but not the problem. Characterizations that would strengthen such a demonstration, though they are not themselves completion requirements, include quantifying how much of each dominant endogenous ion is coextracted alongside the target at the operating potential, and mapping recovery and selectivity across the natural physiological variability of urine pH and ionic strength.

References

  1. Collins, C. J.; Berduque, A.; Arrigan, D. W. M. Electrochemically Modulated Liquid-Liquid Extraction of Ionized Drugs under Physiological Conditions. Analytical Chemistry 2008, 80 (21), 8102-8108. DOI: 10.1021/ac800646b. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac800646b
  2. Collins, C. J.; Arrigan, D. W. M. A review of recent advances in electrochemically modulated extraction methods. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2009, 393 (3), 835-845. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-008-2357-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2357-5
  3. Collins, C. J.; Arrigan, D. W. M. Ion-Transfer Voltammetric Determination of the β-Blocker Propranolol in a Physiological Matrix at Silicon Membrane-Based Liquid-Liquid Microinterface Arrays. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81 (6), 2344-2349. DOI: 10.1021/ac802644g. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac802644g
  4. Berduque, A.; O'Brien, J.; Alderman, J.; Arrigan, D. W. M. Microfluidic chip for electrochemically-modulated liquid-liquid extraction of ions. Electrochemistry Communications 2008, 10 (1), 20-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.10.023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2007.10.023
  5. Velický, M.; Tam, K. Y.; Dryfe, R. A. W. Hydrodynamic voltammetry at the liquid-liquid interface: Application to the transfer of ionised drug molecules. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2012, 683, 94-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.07.037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.07.037
  6. Velický, M.; Tam, K. Y.; Dryfe, R. A. W. Mechanism of Ion Transfer in Supported Liquid Membrane Systems: Electrochemical Control over Membrane Distribution. Analytical Chemistry 2014, 86 (1), 435-442. DOI: 10.1021/ac402328w. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac402328w
  7. Wu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, H.; Su, B.; Fang, Q. Microfluidic droplet-based liquid/liquid extraction modulated by the interfacial Galvani potential difference. Chemical Communications 2011, 47 (20), 5723-5725. DOI: 10.1039/c0cc05815g. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc05815g
  8. Schoonen, J.-W.; van Duinen, V.; Oedit, A.; Vulto, P.; Hankemeier, T.; Lindenburg, P. W. Continuous-Flow Microelectroextraction for Enrichment of Low Abundant Compounds. Analytical Chemistry 2014, 86 (16), 8048-8056. DOI: 10.1021/ac500707v. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac500707v
  9. Jajuli, M. N.; Hussin, M. H.; Rahim, A. A.; Saad, B.; Hébrant, M.; Herzog, G. Preliminary Assays on Electrochemically Modulated Liquid-liquid Extraction of Metformin. Journal of Physical Science 2019, 30 (Supp. 2), 153-166. DOI: 10.21315/jps2019.30.s2.13. https://doi.org/10.21315/jps2019.30.s2.13
  10. Jajuli, M. N.; Hussin, M. H.; Saad, B.; Rahim, A. A.; Hébrant, M.; Herzog, G. Electrochemically Modulated Liquid-Liquid Extraction for Sample Enrichment. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (11), 7466-7473. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01674. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01674
  11. Jajuli, M. N. Electrochemically modulated liquid-liquid extraction and micro-solid phase extraction methods for determination of selected pharmaceutical compounds. PhD dissertation, Universite de Lorraine, 2019 (French title: Extraction liquid-liquide modulée électrochimiquement et microextraction en phase solide de composés pharmaceutiques sélectionnés). DOI: 10.70675/00061708za311z4c74z9edfz8914ea86d03d. https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/tel-02479399
  12. Huang, X.; Xie, L.; Lin, X.; Su, B. Detection of Metoprolol in Human Biofluids and Pharmaceuticals via Ion-Transfer Voltammetry at the Nanoscopic Liquid/Liquid Interface Array. Analytical Chemistry 2017, 89 (1), 945-951. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04099. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04099
  13. Jetmore, H. D.; Anupriya, E. S.; Cress, T. J.; Shen, M. Interface between Two Immiscible Electrolyte Solutions Electrodes for Chemical Analysis. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (48), 16519-16527. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01416. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c01416
  14. Ribeiro, J. A.; Silva, A. F.; Girault, H. H.; Pereira, C. M. Electroanalytical applications of ITIES - A review. Talanta 2024, 280, 126729. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126729
  15. Ribeiro, J. A.; Pereira, C. M. Applications of Electrochemistry at the ITIES in Drug Discovery and Development - A Review. ChemElectroChem 2024, 11 (13), e202400134. DOI: 10.1002/celc.202400134. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202400134
  16. Marco, A.; Aguirre, M. A.; Quijada, C.; Hidalgo, M. Electrochemically controlled liquid-liquid microextraction: an innovative methodology for heavy metal extraction from tea using non-toxic menthol-based eutectic mixture. Analytica Chimica Acta 2025, 1375, 344542. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2025.344542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2025.344542
  17. Marciniak, K.; Rudnicki, K.; Kowalewska, K.; Kowalski, G.; Poltorak, M.; Walecka, I.; Herzog, G.; Poltorak, L. Detection of bilirubin by stripping voltammetry at the gelled anisole-aqueous electrified interface supported with a 3D printed pore. Microchimica Acta 2026, 193 (6), 400. DOI: 10.1007/s00604-026-08130-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-026-08130-3
  18. Kowalski, G.; Mikołajczyk, A.; Rudnicki, K.; Herzog, G.; Kwaczyński, K.; Poltorak, L. Electroanalytical platforms for codeine determination - A comparison between electrified liquid-liquid interface and glassy carbon electrode. Talanta 2027, 311, 130244. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2026.130244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2026.130244