Monozygotic (MZ) twins share nearly identical DNA sequences yet commonly show DNA methylation differences, and dizygotic (DZ) twins are markedly more methylation-discordant than MZ pairs. Kaminsky et al. (Nat Genet 2009) favored, but could not prove, the hypothesis that the excess DZ discordance reflects epigenomic heterogeneity of the zygotes rather than DNA-sequence differences, and explicitly left open the decomposition of twin methylation discordance into zygotic, environmental, developmental-timing, and stochastic sources, as well as its causal contribution to phenotype. Later work resolved components of this question: methylation discordance is already present at birth and is in part attributable to the intrauterine environment; twin- and family-based estimates attribute on average roughly one-fifth of methylation variation to genetic effects; longitudinal studies show progressive, largely non-shared, stochastic drift; and 'epigenetic supersimilarity' loci demonstrate establishment of some methylation states before embryo splitting. However, no study jointly quantifies the relative contributions of all source classes genome-wide, across tissues and life stages, with genetic confounding controlled, nor the causal effect of methylation divergence on twin phenotypic discordance; reviews through 2026 still frame the relative-weight question as unresolved.

Background

Monozygotic (MZ, 'identical') twins originate from a single fertilized egg and share essentially all of their DNA sequence, whereas dizygotic (DZ, 'fraternal') twins arise from two independently fertilized eggs and share, on average, 50% of their segregating sequence variants, like ordinary siblings. The classical twin design compares similarity between MZ and DZ pairs in order to partition phenotypic variance into genetic and environmental components, and its standard interpretation assumes that any excess MZ similarity follows from DNA-sequence identity alone. DNA methylation — the addition of methyl groups to cytosines, predominantly at CpG dinucleotides (a cytosine followed by guanine), which can repress transcription without changing the DNA sequence — provides a plausible non-sequence channel for similarity and dissimilarity: methylation states are written and maintained by enzymatic machinery, can differ between individuals, respond to environment, and drift stochastically over time. Two observations set the stage for this question. First, Fraga et al. (2005) showed that MZ twins are epigenetically similar early in life but accumulate methylation and histone-modification differences with age and divergent lifestyles. Second, Kaminsky et al. (2009) performed the first genome-scale comparison of DNA methylation in MZ and DZ twins, profiling white blood cells and buccal epithelial cells of 114 MZ and 80 DZ twins — with gut biopsies additionally collected from the MZ pairs — across roughly 6,000 unique genomic regions using an HpaII-enrichment assay (a method that reads methylation through a restriction enzyme whose DNA cutting is blocked when its target CCGG site is methylated) coupled to CpG-island microarrays (arrays reporting methylation at CpG islands, genomic regions unusually rich in CpG dinucleotides). Using per-locus intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC — the ratio of between-pair to total within-plus-between-pair variance, summarizing how similar co-twins are at a locus), they found DZ co-twins substantially more methylation-discordant than MZ co-twins in buccal cells. Common SNPs at the enzyme's restriction sites or within 1 kb showed no correlation with the MZ-DZ difference, and a control experiment comparing whole-brain methylation variance within litters of genetically uniform inbred mice versus genetically diverse outbred mice was negative, i.e., genetic heterogeneity alone did not increase within-sibship methylation variance. The authors therefore favored — but explicitly did not prove — the hypothesis that independently formed zygotes carry different epigenomic states ('epigenomic heterogeneity of the zygote'), implying that molecular mechanisms of heritability may not be limited to DNA-sequence differences. The paper itself flagged what remained open: the evidence was indirect and assay-limited (only an estimated 10,000-22,000 of roughly 2.2 million HpaII sites interrogated, about 0.45-1% of them; the methylation-insensitive control enzyme MspI too noisy to rule out restriction-site bias; common-SNP checks only, leaving rare variants and structural variation unexcluded), tissue and species generalizability was untested, and the relative contributions of environment, developmental timing, and chance to epigenetic divergence — and thence to phenotype — were unquantified. Several terms used below are defined as follows: methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTLs) are DNA-sequence variants statistically associated with the methylation level of specific CpG sites; epigenetic drift is the progressive, ostensibly random divergence of methylation states over time; metastable epialleles are genomic sites whose methylation state is established stochastically in the early embryo and then maintained across tissues; and chorionicity — monochorionic versus dichorionic — denotes whether MZ twins share one placenta or have separate placentas, which is determined by the timing of the splitting of the early embryo.

Problem Statement

Observed DNA-methylation discordance between twins — both the excess discordance of DZ relative to MZ pairs and the within-pair discordance of MZ twins themselves — has several conceivable sources: (i) epigenomic heterogeneity of the zygotes, meaning methylation-relevant epigenetic states that already differ between independently formed zygotes or are established before the early embryo splits; (ii) intrauterine environment, including placental sharing and its vascular complications; (iii) postnatal environment and lifestyle; (iv) developmental timing, for example the timing of embryo splitting that determines chorionicity; and (v) stochastic epigenetic drift, the progressive, ostensibly random divergence of methylation states over time. The problem, raised in this form by Kaminsky et al. (2009) and left open by the subsequent literature, is to determine quantitatively and genome-wide the relative contribution of each source to twin methylation discordance, controlling for DNA-sequence effects at all scales (common SNPs, rare variants, structural variation, and effects of methylation quantitative trait loci, i.e. DNA-sequence variants statistically associated with the methylation level of specific CpG sites), and to establish how much of the methylation discordance causally contributes to phenotypic discordance between MZ twins (disease, physiological, and behavioral traits) as opposed to being a consequence of it. The decomposition is sought per locus and in aggregate, across tissues and life stages, together with its identifiability assumptions — in particular how stochastic drift is distinguished from unmeasured non-shared environment — and the phenotypic effect is to be established or bounded.

References

  1. Kaminsky ZA, Tang T, Wang S-C, Ptak C, Oh GHT, Wong AHC, Feldcamp LA, Virtanen C, Halfvarson J, Tysk C, McRae AF, Visscher PM, Montgomery GW, Gottesman II, Martin NG, Petronis A. DNA methylation profiles in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Nature Genetics 2009;41(2):240-245. doi:10.1038/ng.286. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.286
  2. Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, Ropero S, Setien F, Ballestar ML, Heine-Suñer D, Cigudosa JC, Urioste M, Benitez J, Boix-Chornet M, Sanchez-Aguilera A, Ling C, Carlsson E, Poulsen P, Vaag A, Stephan Z, Spector TD, Wu Y-Z, Plass C, Esteller M. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2005;102(30):10604-10609. doi:10.1073/pnas.0500398102. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500398102
  3. Ollikainen M, Smith KR, Joo EJ, Ng HK, Andronikos R, Novakovic B, Abdul Aziz NK, Carlin JB, Morley R, Saffery R, Craig JM. DNA methylation analysis of multiple tissues from newborn twins reveals both genetic and intrauterine components to variation in the human neonatal epigenome. Human Molecular Genetics 2010;19(21):4176-4188. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddq336. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq336
  4. Gervin K, Hammerø M, Akselsen HE, Moe R, Nygård H, Brandt I, Gjessing HK, Harris JR, Undlien DE, Lyle R. Extensive variation and low heritability of DNA methylation identified in a twin study. Genome Research 2011;21(11):1813-1821. doi:10.1101/gr.119685.110. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.119685.110
  5. Bell JT, Spector TD. A twin approach to unraveling epigenetics. Trends in Genetics 2011;27(3):116-125. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2010.12.005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2010.12.005
  6. Baranzini SE, Mudge J, van Velkinburgh JC, Khankhanian P, Khrebtukova I, Miller NA, Zhang L, Farmer AD, Bell CJ, Kim RW, May GD, Woodward JE, Caillier SJ, McElroy JP, Gomez R, Pando MJ, Clendenen LE, Ganusova EE, Schilkey FD, Ramaraj T, Khan OA, Huntley JJ, Luo S, Kwok P-Y, Wu TD, Schroth GP, Oksenberg JR, Hauser SL, Kingsmore SF. Genome, epigenome and RNA sequences of monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis. Nature 2010;464(7293):1351-1356. doi:10.1038/nature08990. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08990
  7. Gordon L, Joo JE, Powell JE, Ollikainen M, Novakovic B, Li X, Andronikos R, Cruickshank MN, Conneely KN, Smith AK, Alisch RS, Morley R, Visscher PM, Craig JM, Saffery R. Neonatal DNA methylation profile in human twins is specified by a complex interplay between intrauterine environmental and genetic factors, subject to tissue-specific influence. Genome Research 2012;22(8):1395-1406. doi:10.1101/gr.136598.111. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.136598.111
  8. Czyz W, Morahan JM, Ebers GC, Ramagopalan SV. Genetic, environmental and stochastic factors in monozygotic twin discordance with a focus on epigenetic differences. BMC Medicine 2012;10:93. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-93. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-93
  9. Martino D, Loke YJ, Gordon L, Ollikainen M, Cruickshank MN, Saffery R, Craig JM. Longitudinal, genome-scale analysis of DNA methylation in twins from birth to 18 months of age reveals rapid epigenetic change in early life and pair-specific effects of discordance. Genome Biology 2013;14:R42. doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r42. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r42
  10. McRae AF, Powell JE, Henders AK, Bowdler L, Hemani G, Shah S, Painter JN, Martin NG, Visscher PM, Montgomery GW. Contribution of genetic variation to transgenerational inheritance of DNA methylation. Genome Biology 2014;15:R73. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-5-r73. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-5-r73
  11. Castillo-Fernandez JE, Spector TD, Bell JT. Epigenetics of discordant monozygotic twins: implications for disease. Genome Medicine 2014;6:60. doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0060-z. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-014-0060-z
  12. Yet I, Tsai P-C, Castillo-Fernandez JE, Carnero-Montoro E, Bell JT. Genetic and environmental impacts on DNA methylation levels in twins. Epigenomics 2016;8(1):105-117. doi:10.2217/epi.15.90. https://doi.org/10.2217/epi.15.90
  13. Tan Q, Heijmans BT, Hjelmborg JvB, Soerensen M, Christensen K, Christiansen L. Epigenetic drift in the aging genome: a ten-year follow-up in an elderly twin cohort. International Journal of Epidemiology 2016;45(4):1146-1158. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw132. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw132
  14. Van Baak TE, Coarfa C, Dugué P-A, Fiorito G, Laritsky E, Baker MS, Kessler NJ, Dong J, Duryea JD, Silver MJ, Saffari A, Prentice AM, Moore SE, Ghantous A, Routledge MN, Gong YY, Herceg Z, Vineis P, Severi G, Hopper JL, Southey MC, Giles GG, Milne RL, Waterland RA. Epigenetic supersimilarity of monozygotic twin pairs. Genome Biology 2018;19:2. doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1374-0. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1374-0
  15. Hannon E, Knox O, Sugden K, Burrage J, Wong CCY, Belsky DW, Corcoran DL, Arseneault L, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Mill J. Characterizing genetic and environmental influences on variable DNA methylation using monozygotic and dizygotic twins. PLoS Genetics 2018;14(8):e1007544. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007544
  16. Planterose Jiménez B, Liu F, Caliebe A, Montiel González D, Bell JT, Kayser M, Vidaki A. Equivalent DNA methylation variation between monozygotic co-twins and unrelated individuals reveals universal epigenetic inter-individual dissimilarity. Genome Biology 2021;22:18. doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02223-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02223-9
  17. Derakhshan M, Kessler NJ, Ishida M, Demetriou C, Brucato N, Moore GE, Fall CHD, Chandak GR, Ricaut F-X, Prentice AM, Hellenthal G, Silver MJ. Tissue- and ethnicity-independent hypervariable DNA methylation states show evidence of establishment in the early human embryo. Nucleic Acids Research 2022;50(12):6735-6752. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac503. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac503
  18. Kuznetsov DV, Liu Y, Schowe AM, Czamara D, Instinske J, Pahnke CKL, Nöthen MM, Spinath FM, Binder EB, Diewald M, Forstner AJ, Kandler C, Mönkediek B. Genetic and environmental contributions to epigenetic aging across adolescence and young adulthood. Clinical Epigenetics 2025;17:78. doi:10.1186/s13148-025-01880-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-025-01880-6
  19. Colacurci D, Maruotti GM, Saccone G, D'Agostino AM, De Santis MV, Riccardi M, Martirani M, Guida M, Sarno L. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms underlying phenotypic discordance in monochorionic monozygotic twins: a systematic review. Genes 2026;17(7):832. doi:10.3390/genes17070832. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes17070832
  20. Waterland RA, Kellermayer R, Laritsky E, Rayco-Solon P, Harris RA, Travisano M, Zhang W, Torskaya MS, Zhang J, Shen L, Manary MJ, Prentice AM. Season of conception in rural Gambia affects DNA methylation at putative human metastable epialleles. PLoS Genetics 2010;6(12):e1001252. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001252