The evolution of the symbiosome — a plant-derived membrane compartment that internalizes nitrogen-fixing rhizobia into host-cell cytoplasm — has been proposed as the innovation that stabilized nodulation in the two most species-rich legume subfamilies, because lineages retaining rhizobia in cell-wall-bound fixation threads (FT-type nodules) show significantly higher rates of nodulation loss. This problem assembles the unresolved empirical program needed to establish or refute that hypothesis, as framed by the source study: (1) test whether the association between FT-type nodules and higher propensity for nodulation loss also holds in the sister subfamily Papilionoideae, a test newly enabled by a resolved phylogenomic backbone; (2) refine the model-dependent minimum estimates and timing of nodulation losses across Caesalpinioideae under improved sampling and explicit gain/loss scenarios; (3) experimentally determine the functional significance of the FT wall and the mechanisms by which the symbiosome membrane tightens host control over symbiont cheating and strain selection; (4) test whether the symbiosome innovation causally contributed to the species diversification of symbiosome-type lineages, controlling for other candidate drivers; and (5) identify, by comparative genomics, the genetic changes associated with transitions between nodule types and with the stabilization of nodulation.

Background

Legumes (Fabaceae) can form root nodules hosting nitrogen-fixing bacteria (rhizobia), supplying the plant with fixed nitrogen. Across the two largest subfamilies, Caesalpinioideae and Papilionoideae, nodules come in two anatomical types defined by how the bacteria are accommodated inside host cells. In symbiosome-type (SYM-type) nodules — the familiar pea and Medicago case — rhizobia are released from the infection thread (an invagination of the root-hair cell wall that conveys bacteria to the nodule) into the host cytoplasm, enclosed only by a plant-derived peribacteroid (symbiosome) membrane. In fixation-thread-type (FT-type) nodules — found in actinorhizal symbioses (partnerships of plants with Frankia actinobacteria), in the nonlegume Parasponia, in most nodulating nonmimosoid Caesalpinioideae, and sporadically in early-diverging Papilionoideae lineages such as Andira, Dahlstedtia, Hymenolobium and tribe Brongniartieae — the nitrogen-fixing bacteroids (the differentiated form rhizobia take inside nodules) remain extracellular (in the apoplast, outside the host-cell plasma membrane), each surrounded by a thin cell wall continuous with the infection thread, so the symbiont is compartmentalized only to a modest degree.

Whether nodulation arose once and was lost many times, or gained repeatedly, is debated; the single-gain–massive-losses scenario (Werner et al. 2014, DOI 10.1038/ncomms5087) is supported by comparative genomics showing pseudogenization (accumulation of disabled, nonfunctional gene copies) of nodulation genes in nonnodulating species, but has been challenged by phylogenetic work favoring multiple gains (Kates et al. 2024). Within this framing, de Faria et al. (2022) characterized nodule anatomy across 128 species spanning 56 of the 152 genera of Caesalpinioideae, mapped it onto a 997-gene phylogenomic tree, and found that losses of nodulation are concentrated in FT-type lineages: seventeen hypothesized losses across the subfamily, twelve in ancestrally FT-type lineages versus five in ancestrally SYM-type lineages, with loss rates up to about six times higher in FT-type lineages (0.0174 versus 0.0028 losses per million years). The transition to symbiosomes on the stem lineage of the species-rich Mimosoid clade (the nested, mostly nodulating clade formerly treated as subfamily Mimosoideae) coincides with markedly fewer losses. The interpretation draws on evolutionary-conflict theory: hosts benefit from compartmentalizing symbionts, because tightly enclosed symbionts are easier to control, sanction (punish by restricting their carbon supply), and terminate, and the symbiosome membrane is the actual nutrient-exchange interface. The FT wall — thin, rich in cellulose and hemicellulose but poor in homogalacturonan pectin relative to the thicker infection-thread wall — is proposed to be protective, preventing undifferentiated bacteroids from proliferating within the host cell while shielding them from being recognized as pathogens, but this was proposed as a hypothesis, not demonstrated.

The source study itself listed what would be needed to make the claim causal, and this is what remains unresolved. First, the key comparative prediction — that FT-type nodules are likewise associated with more frequent nodulation losses in Papilionoideae, where FT-type nodules occur sporadically among the early divergences while all species-rich nodulating clades (the 'stable fixers' of Werner et al. 2014) are SYM-type — could not be tested for lack of a resolved backbone phylogeny of the early-diverging papilionoid lineages; such a backbone now exists (Cai et al. 2025), but the test itself has not been performed. Second, the seventeen losses are minima given the taxa sampled, their timing constrained only to maximum ages, and loss counts are model-dependent — so refined reconstructions must confront the ongoing single-versus-multiple-origins controversy. Third, no direct experimental test of FT-wall function or of the mechanistic link between symbiosome compartmentalization and host control of symbiont cheating exists; all mechanistic evidence comes from SYM-type papilionoids. Fourth, the source study's proposal that the symbiosome potentially contributed to the massive diversification of SYM-type lineages remains correlational; testing it causally would require controlling for confounding drivers such as keel flowers (the butterfly-shaped, fused-petal flowers characteristic of many papilionoids), chemical defense, or climatic niche expansion — a requirement highlighted by subsequent state-dependent diversification analyses (Cai et al. 2025) rather than enumerated by the source study itself. Fifth, the comparative genomics of FT- versus SYM-forming lineages needed to identify the genetic basis of the transition — now partially enabled by the Chamaecrista fasciculata genome and cross-family gene-regulatory-network reconstructions — has not been carried out.

Problem Statement

Establish, or refute, the claim that the innovation of the symbiosome causally stabilized nitrogen-fixing nodulation in legumes, by delivering the following linked results on the comparative pattern, mechanism, consequence, and genomic basis of the distinction between fixation-thread (FT) nodules — in which the nitrogen-fixing bacteroids stay extracellular, each enclosed by a thin plant cell wall continuous with the infection thread — and symbiosome (SYM) nodules — in which rhizobia are internalized into the host-cell cytoplasm enclosed only by a plant-derived membrane — as framed by de Faria et al. (2022):

  1. Comparative pattern in Papilionoideae. Using the now-available resolved phylogenomic backbone of the early-diverging papilionoid lineages (Cai et al. 2025) together with a documented nodule-type and nodulation-status trait matrix, test whether the association observed in Caesalpinioideae — higher propensity and rate of evolutionary loss of nodulation in FT-type lineages relative to SYM-type lineages — also holds across Papilionoideae, where FT-type nodules occur sporadically among the initial divergences while all species-rich nodulating clades are SYM-type.

  2. Robust loss reconstruction in Caesalpinioideae. Refine the minimum-count estimates and timing of nodulation losses across Caesalpinioideae (twelve losses in ancestrally FT-type lineages and five in ancestrally SYM-type lineages in the source study) under denser taxon and character sampling, and determine how these counts and dates change under alternative gain/loss scenarios, given the unresolved single-versus-multiple-origins controversy.

  3. Functional mechanism. Experimentally test the proposed protective role of the thin, pectin-poor FT wall — that it prevents undifferentiated bacteroids from proliferating uncontrollably ('going rogue') within the host cell while preventing the plant from identifying them as pathogens — against alternatives (for example, that it matters little for oxygen or nutrient exchange given the surrounding symbiosome membrane), and elucidate the mechanisms by which SYM-type compartmentalization tightens host control over symbiont cheating and strain selection relative to FT-type hosts.

  4. Diversification consequence. Test, with comparative analyses that control for other candidate drivers of diversification (floral innovations such as keel flowers, chemical defense, climatic and geographic niche expansion), whether the adoption of SYM-type nodules causally contributed to the elevated species diversification of SYM-type lineages (the Mimosoid clade and core Papilionoideae), beyond the correlational association.

  5. Genomic basis. Carry out the comparative genomic analysis of FT- and SYM-forming (and nonnodulating) lineages — now enabled by resources such as the Chamaecrista fasciculata genome — to identify genetic changes associated with the transitions between nodule types and with the stabilization of nodulation.

All five results are mandatory: a resolution requires delivering every one of them, and neither a proper subset nor a refutation confined to a single result by itself establishes or refutes the objective, since each result bears on a distinct component — comparative pattern, loss reconstruction, mechanism, diversification consequence, or genomic basis — of the single causal claim.

These five results jointly support one objective — a causal evaluation of the symbiosome-stability hypothesis.

References

  1. de Faria SM, Ringelberg JJ, Gross E, Koenen EJM, Cardoso D, Ametsitsi GKD, Akomatey J, Maluk M, Tak N, Gehlot HS, Wright KM, Teaumroong N, Songwattana P, de Lima HC, Prin Y, Zartman CE, Sprent JI, Ardley J, Hughes CE, James EK (2022) The innovation of the symbiosome has enhanced the evolutionary stability of nitrogen fixation in legumes. New Phytologist 235: 2365–2377. DOI 10.1111/nph.18321 (published version of bioRxiv 10.1101/2022.03.04.482842). https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18321
  2. Werner GDA, Cornwell WK, Sprent JI, Kattge J, Kiers ET (2014) A single evolutionary innovation drives the deep evolution of symbiotic N2-fixation in angiosperms. Nature Communications 5: 4087. DOI 10.1038/ncomms5087. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5087
  3. Casaes PA, Ferreira dos Santos JM, Silva VC, Rhem MFK, Teixeira Cota MM, de Faria SM, Rando JG, James EK, Gross E (2024) The radiation of nodulated Chamaecrista species from the rainforest into more diverse habitats has been accompanied by a reduction in growth form and a shift from fixation threads to symbiosomes. Journal of Experimental Botany 75: 3643–3662. DOI 10.1093/jxb/erae134. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae134
  4. Kates HR, O'Meara BC, LaFrance R, Stull GW, James EK, Liu S-Y, Tian Q, Yi T-S, Conde D, Kirst M, Ané J-M, Soltis DE, Guralnick RP, Soltis PS, Folk RA (2024) Shifts in evolutionary lability underlie independent gains and losses of root-nodule symbiosis in a single clade of plants. Nature Communications 15: 4262. DOI 10.1038/s41467-024-48036-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48036-3
  5. Cai L, Cardoso D, Tressel LG, Lee C, Shrestha B, Choi I-S, de Lima HC, de Queiroz LP, Ruhlman TA, Jansen RK, Wojciechowski MF (2025) Well-resolved phylogeny supports repeated evolution of keel flowers as a synergistic contributor to papilionoid legume diversification. New Phytologist 247: 369–387. DOI 10.1111/nph.70080. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70080
  6. Doyle JJ, Ren J, Pawlowski K, James EK, Gao Y (2025) One versus many independent assemblies of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in flowering plants. Nature Communications 16: 5345. DOI 10.1038/s41467-025-60433-w. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60433-w
  7. Adema K, Kohlen W (2024) The symbiosome — a transient organelle in evolution. Journal of Experimental Botany 75: 3209–3213. DOI 10.1093/jxb/erae152. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae152
  8. Lee H, Stai JS, Xu Q, Hewavithana T, Soman P, Batra R, Liu A, Jordan BD, Walstead R, Jenkins J, Williams M, Webber J, Grimwood J, Lovell JT, Brůna T, Shu S, Keymanesh K, Eichenberger J, Schmutz J, Goodstein DM, Barry K, Sankoff D, Jin L, Leebens-Mack JH, Cannon SB (2026) Legume genome structures and histories inferred from Cercis canadensis and Chamaecrista fasciculata genomes. The Plant Journal 126: e70981. DOI 10.1111/tpj.70981. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.70981
  9. Tak N, Zawada Z, Maluk M, Beukes C, Ketelboeter LM, Gehlot HS, Gyaneshwar P, James EK (2026) Comparative genomic analysis of North American Bradyrhizobium symbionts of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Caesalpinioideae) with related bradyrhizobia. Microbiology Spectrum: e00798-26. DOI 10.1128/spectrum.00798-26. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00798-26
  10. Liu H, Hou L, Lan L, Zhang R, Wang D-J, Feng H, Chen C-Y, Ye J-J, Oyebanji OO, Chukwuma EC, Chen S-Y, Tong Y-X, Yang J-B, Yang J, Murray JD, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Zhang X-W, Li D-Z, Yi T-S, Wang E (2026) Evolution of root nodule symbiosis via paleopolyploidy and modular pathway rewiring. Cell Host & Microbe 34: 324–343. DOI 10.1016/j.chom.2026.01.001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2026.01.001
  11. Hu B, Hänsch R, Grunau K, Hohtanz L, Kucklick M, Grünig N, Hänsch VG, Liu R, Peng T, Wiebicke M, Sarhangi Fard I, Messerer M, Gädeke F, Stradal TEB, Milatz M, Hertweck C, Engelmann S, Rennenberg H, Oliphant KD (2026) Symbiotic peptides modulate rhizobial physiology without terminal differentiation. Science Advances 12: eaed2816. DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aed2816. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aed2816