Bright autumn coloration of deciduous leaves — yellow carotenoids revealed by chlorophyll degradation and red anthocyanins synthesized de novo in senescing leaves — is among the most conspicuous seasonal phenomena in temperate vegetation, yet its adaptive explanation remains unresolved after more than a century of debate and two decades of focused research since the co-evolutionary signalling hypothesis was proposed. Two rival families of hypotheses dominate: photoprotection (pigments shield the senescing leaf from photo-oxidative damage, enabling efficient nutrient resorption) and co-evolutionary signalling (bright colour is a costly honest signal of defensive commitment that steers autumn-colonizing aphids away from well-defended trees). A field comparison of mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia) populations found partial support for both and left the causal, mechanistic, sensory, and evolutionary questions open. In the literature through 2024, aphid preference tests, apple-domestication evidence, and pigment-defence covariation studies support parts of the signalling account, while interspecific nitrogen-resorption analyses and mechanistic photoprotection work give directly conflicting verdicts; recent reviews (2022) describe the debate as unresolved and the hypotheses as non-exclusive. The problem remains open, with a well-defined discriminating core: which function or combination of functions of autumn leaf colouration is supported by direct experimental and comparative evidence.

Background

Every autumn, deciduous trees and shrubs of temperate regions dismantle their photosynthetic apparatus before shedding their leaves. As green chlorophyll is broken down and its nitrogen recovered for storage in perennial tissues (nutrient, especially nitrogen, resorption), yellow-to-orange carotenoid pigments — present in the leaf all along — become visible, while many species additionally synthesize red-to-purple anthocyanin pigments de novo in the vacuoles of senescing leaf cells. The yellow component is thus an unmasked by-product, but the red component is a fresh biosynthetic investment made in tissue the plant is about to abandon, at a time when the leaf is unusually vulnerable to excess light because its harvesting machinery is being dismantled (the risk of photoinhibition — light-induced damage to photosynthesis — and photo-oxidative stress). This investment has invited adaptive explanations since the nineteenth century, and at least ten distinct hypotheses have been proposed (Archetti 2009).

Two families of explanation dominate (Archetti et al. 2009). The photoprotection hypothesis holds that anthocyanins — and the visible carotenoids — are functional: by absorbing light and scavenging reactive oxygen species they protect the senescing leaf under cold, bright conditions, extending the time available for efficient nitrogen resorption before abscission. The co-evolutionary (signalling) hypothesis, introduced by Archetti (2000) and elaborated by Hamilton and Brown (2001), holds that bright autumn colour is a costly, honest 'handicap' signal (in signalling theory, a signal whose cost makes cheating unprofitable) advertising the tree's defensive commitment to herbivorous insects — chiefly aphids that fly in autumn, choose the individual trees on which to lay eggs, and whose offspring feed in spring. Because better-defended trees can more cheaply afford a strong display, aphids should preferentially colonize dull or green individuals; consistent with this comparative prediction, tree species hosting richer specialist aphid faunas signal more strongly.

Rolshausen and Schaefer (2007) compared yellow and red colouration in three groups of mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia): young and adult montane groups facing cold temperatures and few aphids, and a lowland group facing many aphids. Red development tracked falling daytime temperature (consistent with photoprotection), and strongly coloured trees hosted fewer landing aphids (consistent with signalling) — yet the two processes were phenologically mistimed, and adult montane trees lacked red leaves despite the colder conditions. The authors therefore left open which hypothesis, if either, explains autumn colouration.

Several specialist facts frame the subsequent debate. Aphids lack a red photoreceptor, yet behavioural experiments with large natural stimulus sets show they can nevertheless distinguish red from green leaves on average and find yellow leaves most attractive, leaving open whether red functions as a signal, as camouflage against over-attractive yellow, or neither (Döring et al. 2009). Leaf colour also covaries with leaf chemistry, including antifeedant compounds, so field correlations between colour and herbivory do not by themselves establish that colour is the operative cue (Menzies et al. 2016; Green et al. 2015). A 2009 consensus review by eleven researchers spanning plant physiology, sensory ecology, and evolutionary biology classified the hypotheses and identified these two as frontrunners, concluding that photoprotection was 'controversial but still tenable' and that available tests of the co-evolution hypothesis were 'consistent' with it (Archetti et al. 2009); a comprehensive 2022 review still describes the question as unresolved, with the two hypotheses non-exclusive (Lev-Yadun 2022).

Problem Statement

Determine the adaptive and mechanistic explanation of autumn leaf colouration — in mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia) specifically and, more generally, in deciduous trees — by establishing, through direct experimental and comparative evidence, whether herbivore resistance (the co-evolutionary signalling hypothesis) and/or photoprotection explains it. The objective is a discriminative account: it must show which predictions of each hypothesis are supported and which refuted, rather than adding further correlations consistent with both. Among the lines of direct evidence that could discriminate between the hypotheses are: (1) the causal chain from pigment expression to physiological protection and nutrient retranslocation — does anthocyanin production itself, as opposed to coincident chlorophyll resorption, improve photoprotection and nitrogen resorption under cold and high-light conditions? (2) covariation — do pigment levels covary with specific defensive metabolites, and does that covariation explain herbivore avoidance of strongly coloured trees? (3) proximate cues — which sensory cues (visual, olfactory, or correlated plant state) do migrating aphids actually use in host selection? (4) selection closure — does the insects' behavioural response to autumn signals or cues confer differential fitness outcomes on trees that impose selection on colouration, the condition required for a co-evolutionary origin? The answer may legitimately conclude that the functions operate jointly (as the complementary-hypotheses proposal suggests), that one suffices, or that neither is supported — provided each conclusion follows from evidence that discriminates among the hypotheses' distinct predictions; the four numbered lines above are illustrative examples of such discriminating evidence, and the account is not required to cover all of them.

References

  1. Rolshausen G, Schaefer HM (2007). Do aphids paint the tree red (or yellow)—can herbivore resistance or photoprotection explain colourful leaves in autumn? Plant Ecology 191:77–84. DOI: 10.1007/s11258-006-9215-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9215-3
  2. Archetti M (2000). The origin of autumn colours by coevolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 205:625–630. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2089. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2089
  3. Hamilton WD, Brown SP (2001). Autumn tree colours as a handicap signal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268:1489–1493. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1672. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1672
  4. Archetti M, Leather SR (2005). A test of the coevolution theory of autumn colours: colour preference of Rhopalosiphum padi on Prunus padus. Oikos 110:339–343. DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13656.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13656.x
  5. Schaefer HM, Rolshausen G (2007). Aphids do not attend to leaf colour as visual signal, but to the handicap of reproductive investment. Biology Letters 3:1–4. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0548. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0548
  6. Döring TF, Archetti M, Hardie J (2009). Autumn leaves seen through herbivore eyes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276:121–127. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0858. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0858
  7. Archetti M (2009). Evidence from the domestication of apple for the maintenance of autumn colours by coevolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276:2575–2580. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0355. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0355
  8. Archetti M (2009). Classification of hypotheses on the evolution of autumn colours. Oikos 118:328–333. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17164.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17164.x
  9. Archetti M, Döring TF, Hagen SB, Hughes NM, Leather SR, Lee DW, Lev-Yadun S, Manetas Y, Ougham H, Schaberg PG, Thomas H (2009). Unravelling the evolution of autumn colours: an interdisciplinary approach. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:166–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.006
  10. Green JP, Foster R, Wilkins L, Osorio D, Hartley SE (2015). Leaf colour as a signal of chemical defence to insect herbivores in wild cabbage (Brassica oleracea). PLoS ONE 10:e0136884. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136884. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136884
  11. Menzies IJ, Youard LW, Lord JM, Carpenter KL, van Klink JW, Perry NB, Schaefer HM, Gould KS (2016). Leaf colour polymorphisms: a balance between plant defence and photosynthesis. Journal of Ecology 104:104–113. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12494. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12494
  12. Renner SS, Zohner CM (2019). The occurrence of red and yellow autumn leaves explained by regional differences in insolation and temperature. New Phytologist 224:1464–1471. DOI: 10.1111/nph.15900. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15900
  13. Peña-Novas I, Archetti M (2020). Biogeography and evidence for adaptive explanations of autumn colors. New Phytologist 228:809–813. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16478. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16478
  14. Renner SS, Zohner CM (2020). Further analysis of 1532 deciduous woody species from North America, Europe, and Asia supports continental-scale differences in red autumn colouration. New Phytologist 228:814–815. DOI: 10.1111/nph.16594. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16594
  15. Peña-Novas I, Archetti M (2020). A comparative analysis of the photoprotection hypothesis for the evolution of autumn colours. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 33:1669–1676. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13734
  16. Peña-Novas I, Archetti M (2021). A test of the photoprotection hypothesis for the evolution of autumn colours: chlorophyll resorption, not anthocyanin production, is correlated with nitrogen translocation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 34:1423–1431. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13903. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13903
  17. Agati G, Guidi L, Landi M, Tattini M (2021). Anthocyanins in photoprotection: knowing the actors in play to solve this complex ecophysiological issue. New Phytologist 232:2228–2235. DOI: 10.1111/nph.17648. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17648
  18. Hughes NM, George CO, Gumpman CB, Neufeld HS (2022). Coevolution and photoprotection as complementary hypotheses for autumn leaf reddening: a nutrient-centered perspective. New Phytologist 233:22–29. DOI: 10.1111/nph.17735. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17735
  19. Joly S (2022). Red and yellow pigments in autumn leaves are associated with higher nitrogen resorption. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 35:180–182. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13961. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13961
  20. Lev-Yadun S (2022). The phenomenon of red and yellow autumn leaves: Hypotheses, agreements and disagreements. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 35:1245–1282. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.14069. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14069
  21. Koide D, Kobayashi M (2025). Chlorophyll and topographic patterns demonstrate stress conditions drive the brightness of autumn leaf colour. Plant Biology 27:279–286 (online 2024). DOI: 10.1111/plb.13755. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13755