The oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) of photosystem II, a Mn4CaO5 cluster, accumulates four oxidizing equivalents through the Kok-cycle S-states before releasing O2 from two water molecules. Rummel and O'Malley (J. Phys. Chem. B 2022) proposed, from broken-symmetry DFT and EPR analysis, that already in the penultimate S3 state an equilibrium exists between an O5-oxo/O6-hydroxo form (total spin S = 3) and a ligand-centered species [O5O6]3−[O5O6]^{3-} (S = 6) carrying a two-center one-electron O-O bond between the mu4-oxo bridge O5 and the sixth, inserted oxygen O6; subsequent oxidation through peroxo and superoxo intermediates then releases triplet O2 along a low-energy pathway with two spin crossovers. None of these species has been directly observed, and the proposal stands in tension with Mn-centered interpretations of the S3 state. The problem defined here asks for direct experimental detection, quantification, or quantitative exclusion of the [O5O6]3−[O5O6]^{3-} (S = 6) species and of the peroxo/superoxo intermediates, for identification of the protonation dynamics that establish the S3 equilibrium, and for validation of the computed energetics and magnetic parameters at theoretical levels beyond the original treatment.

Background

Photosystem II (PSII) is the photosynthetic reaction center that oxidizes water to molecular oxygen, the reaction that produced and maintains Earth's oxygen atmosphere. The catalytic site, the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC), is an inorganic Mn4CaO5 cluster ligated by amino-acid side chains (including the carboxylate of D1-Glu189) and by water molecules. Catalysis proceeds through the Kok cycle: after each of four light-driven charge separations, the redox-active tyrosine YZ (D1-Tyr161) removes one electron from the cluster, stepping it through the oxidation states S0 to S4 and back to S0, with O2 released during the final S3-to-S0 transition and protons expelled through dedicated channels (notably the Cl1 channel). Serial femtosecond crystallography at X-ray free-electron lasers (XFEL-SFX, which collects diffraction before radiation damage sets in) showed that on reaching the S3 state an additional oxygen ligand, labeled O6, appears between Ca and Mn1, next to the flexible μ4\mu_4-oxo bridge O5 that links Mn1 and Mn4.

How the O-O bond actually forms is the central unresolved mechanistic question of the field. Most proposals posit a highly reactive oxo or oxyl radical only in the transient S4 state; others invoke water nucleophilic attack on a metal oxo. Rummel and O'Malley (2022) instead proposed an 'electronic level' mechanism built from broken-symmetry density functional theory (BS-DFT, calculations on antiferromagnetically coupled spin arrangements of the Mn ions) analyzed with intrinsic bonding orbitals (IBOs, localized orbitals that allow electron flow to be followed along a reaction coordinate). In their picture, the S3 state already contains an equilibrium between (a) an O5-oxo/O6-hydroxo form with total spin S = 3 and four Mn(IV) ions, which is the form detected by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and (b) a deprotonated, ligand-centered species [O5O6]3−[O5O6]^{3-}, in which O5 and O6 share a two-center one-electron bond (formally the first one-electron oxidation product of the two substrate waters) and the cluster has total spin S = 6, stabilized by antiferromagnetic coupling to the Mn ions. Two spin crossovers then provide a low-energy path along which the O5-O6 distance contracts from about 2.1 angstroms to a peroxo (O2 with charge 2-) intermediate; one further oxidation yields superoxo (O2 with charge 1-), which releases triplet O2. The authors inferred that the S3 equilibrium is established by a 'proton shuffle' between O6 and the nearby D1-Glu189 carboxylate (O6 to O(Glu189) distance about 2.4-2.5 angstroms in XFEL structures), and that assuming roughly 70 percent of the S = 6 form improves the fit to the W-band (about 94 GHz) EPR spectrum of the two-flash state (the S3 state, reached by giving two light flashes to dark-adapted samples); the S = 6 form itself is predicted to have only a low-intensity EPR envelope and so would be easily overshadowed by the S = 3 form.

The proposal is consequential but unverified, and parts of its empirical basis are contested. High-energy-resolution fluorescence-detected X-ray absorption spectroscopy (HERFD-XAS, which resolves the Mn K pre-edge region sensitive to Mn oxidation states) on chemically unperturbed S3 samples supports Mn-centered, all-Mn(IV) oxidation and explicitly does not support peroxo or oxyl character in the active S3 configuration. Whether O6 is a genuine state-specific ligand at all is debated: one reanalysis of the two-flash XFEL data attributes its electron density to a two-conformer disorder of O5, a conclusion rebutted by improved omit maps resolving a partially occupied O6 site. Time-resolved XFEL and X-ray emission studies of the S3-to-S0 transition observe early transients (about 50-500 microseconds) and peroxide-like late intermediates (about 700-1200 microseconds), but none has identified the proposed S3-equilibrium [O5O6]3−[O5O6]^{3-}, peroxo, or superoxo species, nor measured the cluster spin state along the path. Answering the question below therefore requires direct spectroscopic and structural detection (or quantitative exclusion) of the proposed species, the protonation dynamics that produce them, and independent theoretical validation of the computed energetics.

Problem Statement

Determine, by direct experiment and higher-level theory, whether the S3 state of the oxygen-evolving complex of photosystem II contains the ligand-centered species [O5O6]3−[O5O6]^{3-} - a two-center one-electron O-O bond between the μ4\mu_4-oxo bridge O5 and the inserted sixth oxygen O6, with total spin S=6S=6 - in equilibrium with the O5-oxo/O6-hydroxo (S=3S=3) form, and whether O-O bond formation then proceeds by the proposed low-energy sequence [O5O6]3−[O5O6]^{3-}, then peroxo, then superoxo, then triplet O2, during the S3 to S3YZ• to transient [S4] to S0 transition sequence (S3YZ• denoting the S3 state with the redox-active tyrosine YZ oxidized to its radical form). An answer must establish the following linked observables of this single mechanism question: (i) detect and quantify, or set explicit quantitative upper bounds excluding, the S=6S=6 [O5O6]3−[O5O6]^{3-} component in S3-advanced samples (samples advanced predominantly to S3 by two flashes from the dark-adapted S1 state), with the organism stated so that organismal generality (cyanobacterial versus higher-plant photosystem II) is addressed, discriminating it spectroscopically from the S=3S=3 form (for example by high-field EPR with spin-Hamiltonian simulation of the two-flash state); (ii) detect, time-resolve, and quantify the peroxo and superoxo intermediates and their ordering relative to YZ reduction and O2 release; (iii) identify which proton-acceptor pathway deprotonates O6 and establishes the S3 equilibrium - the originally proposed O6-Glu189 proton shuffle or the water-network alternatives (W3/W2, Cl1 channel) - together with the timing of the event; and (iv) establish whether the computed relative energetics of the competing S3 species, their exchange couplings, and their zero-field splittings are reproduced at theoretical levels beyond the original BS-DFT/IBO treatment (a definitive, method-corroborated negative on (i) and (ii) is a complete and admissible answer, sufficient without the protonation pathway (iii) or the theoretical reproduction (iv)). A definitive, method-corroborated negative on (i) and (ii) - for example a stated population bound on the S=6S=6 form together with exclusion of S3 peroxo - refutes the proposed mechanism as nature's dominant O2-forming route and is an admissible complete answer.

References

  1. Rummel, F.; O'Malley, P. J. How Nature Makes O2: an Electronic Level Mechanism for Water Oxidation in Photosynthesis. J. Phys. Chem. B 2022, 126, 8214-8221. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c06374. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c06374
  2. Chrysina, M.; Drosou, M.; Castillo, R. G.; Reus, M.; Neese, F.; Krewald, V.; Pantazis, D. A.; DeBeer, S. Nature of S-States in the Oxygen-Evolving Complex Resolved by High-Energy Resolution Fluorescence Detected X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 25579-25594. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c06046. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c06046
  3. Drosou, M.; Comas-Vilà, G.; Neese, F.; Salvador, P.; Pantazis, D. A. Does Serial Femtosecond Crystallography Depict State-Specific Catalytic Intermediates of the Oxygen-Evolving Complex? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 10604-10621. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c00489. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00489
  4. Wang, J. Photosystem II: light-dependent oscillation of ligand composition at its active site. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 2024, 80, 850-861. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798324011392. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798324011392
  5. Li, H.; Suga, M.; Shen, J.-R. Comment on Photosystem II: light-dependent oscillation of ligand composition at its active site: existence of O6 in S3-state photosystem II revealed by omit maps. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 2026, 82, 574-586. DOI: 10.1107/S2059798326003621. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798326003621
  6. Li, H.; Nakajima, Y.; Nango, E.; Owada, S.; Yamada, D.; Hashimoto, K.; Luo, F.; Tanaka, R.; Akita, F.; Kato, K.; Kang, J.; Saitoh, Y.; Kishi, S.; Yu, H.; Matsubara, N.; Fujii, H.; Sugahara, M.; Suzuki, M.; Masuda, T.; Kimura, T.; Thao, T. N.; Yonekura, S.; Yu, L.-J.; Tosha, T.; Tono, K.; Joti, Y.; Hatsui, T.; Yabashi, M.; Kubo, M.; Iwata, S.; Isobe, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Suga, M.; Shen, J.-R. Oxygen-evolving photosystem II structures during S1-S2-S3 transitions. Nature 2024, 626, 670-677. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06987-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06987-5
  7. Bhowmick, A.; Hussein, R.; Bogacz, I.; Simon, P. S.; Ibrahim, M.; Chatterjee, R.; Doyle, M. D.; Cheah, M. H.; Fransson, T.; Chernev, P.; Kim, I. S.; Makita, H.; Dasgupta, M.; Kaminsky, C. J.; Zhang, M.; Gätcke, J.; Haupt, S.; Nangca, I. I.; Keable, S. M.; Aydin, A. O.; Tono, K.; Owada, S.; Gee, L. B.; Fuller, F. D.; Batyuk, A.; Alonso-Mori, R.; Holton, J. M.; Paley, D. W.; Moriarty, N. W.; Mamedov, F.; Adams, P. D.; Brewster, A. S.; Dobbek, H.; Sauter, N. K.; Bergmann, U.; Zouni, A.; Messinger, J.; Kern, J.; Yano, J.; Yachandra, V. K. Structural evidence for intermediates during O2 formation in photosystem II. Nature 2023, 617, 629-636. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06038-z. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06038-z
  8. Jensen, S.; Sullivan, B. T.; Hartzler, D. A.; Kosheleva, I.; Henning, R. W.; Page, A.; Pushkar, Y. Challenges of observing O-O bond formation in the Mn4Ca cluster of photosystem II. Chem 2025, 11, 102448. DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2025.102448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2025.102448
  9. Maximova, O.; Bhowmick, S.; Tuncer, H.; Bury, G.; Henning, R.; Kosheleva, I.; Kim, I. S.; Mohammadi, O.; Levantino, M.; Cammarata, M.; Pushkar, Y. Time-resolved Mn K-alpha emission reveals early redox dynamics in the S3 to S0 transition of the photosystem II Kok cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 2026, 302, 111215. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2026.111215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2026.111215
  10. Rummel, F.; Malcomson, T.; Barchenko, M.; O'Malley, P. J. Insights into PSII's S3YZ• State: An Electronic and Magnetic Analysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2024, 15, 499-506. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03026. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03026
  11. Malcomson, T.; Rummel, F.; Barchenko, M.; O'Malley, P. J. Hey ho, where'd the proton go? Final deprotonation of O6 within the S3 state of photosystem II. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2024, 257, 112946. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2024.112946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2024.112946
  12. Allgöwer, F.; Pöverlein, M. C.; Rutherford, A. W.; Kaila, V. R. I. Mechanism of proton release during water oxidation in Photosystem II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2413396121. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2413396121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2413396121
  13. Sugie, K.; Kato, Y.; Nagao, R.; Noguchi, T. Mechanism of the Oxygen-Evolving Process in the Water-Oxidizing Complex of Photosystem II, as Revealed by Time-Resolved Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2025, 129, 6172-6187. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02806. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02806
  14. Guo, Y.; Messinger, J.; Kloo, L.; Sun, L. Alternative Mechanism for O2 Formation in Natural Photosynthesis via Nucleophilic Oxo-Oxo Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 4129-4141. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c12174. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c12174
  15. Guo, Y.; He, L.; Ding, Y.; Kloo, L.; Pantazis, D. A.; Messinger, J.; Sun, L. Closing Kok's cycle of nature's water oxidation catalysis. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5982. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50210-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50210-6
  16. Pushkar, Y. New Water Oxidation Mechanism in Photosystem II Resolves Major Experimental Controversies. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2026, 65, e1930324. DOI: 10.1002/anie.1930324. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.1930324
  17. Ariafard, A.; Longhurst, M.; Swiegers, G. F.; Stranger, R. XFEL-Detected Peroxide Formation From the S3 State Supports the Low Oxidation State over the High Oxidation State Paradigm in Photosystem II. Chem. Eur. J. 2026, 32, e202503024. DOI: 10.1002/chem.202503024. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202503024
  18. de Lichtenberg, C.; Rapatskiy, L.; Reus, M.; Heyno, E.; Schnegg, A.; Nowaczyk, M. M.; Lubitz, W.; Messinger, J.; Cox, N. Assignment of the slowly exchanging substrate water of nature's water-splitting cofactor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2319374121. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2319374121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2319374121
  19. Suga, M.; Akita, F.; Sugahara, M.; Kubo, M.; Nakajima, Y.; Nakane, T.; Yamashita, K.; Umena, Y.; Nakabayashi, M.; Yamane, T.; Nakano, T.; Suzuki, M.; Masuda, T.; Inoue, S.; Kimura, T.; Nomura, T.; Yonekura, S.; Yu, L.-J.; Sakamoto, T.; Motomura, T.; Chen, J.-H.; Kato, Y.; Noguchi, T.; Tono, K.; Joti, Y.; Kameshima, T.; Hatsui, T.; Nango, E.; Tanaka, R.; Naitow, H.; Matsuura, Y.; Yamashita, A.; Yamamoto, M.; Nureki, O.; Yabashi, M.; Ishikawa, T.; Iwata, S.; Shen, J.-R. Light-induced structural changes and the site of O=O bond formation in PSII caught by XFEL. Nature 2017, 543, 131-135. DOI: 10.1038/nature21400. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21400
  20. Isobe, H.; Suzuki, T.; Suga, M.; Shen, J.-R.; Yamaguchi, K. Conformational Flexibility of D1-Glu189: A Crucial Determinant in Substrate Water Selection, Positioning, and Stabilization within the Oxygen-Evolving Complex of Photosystem II. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 50041-50048. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c09981. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c09981