A 2010 quantitative study of pollen tube guidance (Stewman, Jones-Rhoades, Bhimalapuram, Tchernookov, Preuss and Dinner, BMC Plant Biology 10:32) used a semi-in-vitro Arabidopsis assay and a stochastic model in which a pollen tube reorients by sensing the difference in attractant concentration, Δc\Delta c, across its tip, transduced as a difference in the fraction of bound receptors, and showed that growth-rate slowing near the ovule greatly enhances targeting accuracy. That study explicitly left open the molecular identity of the ovule attractants and their pollen-tube receptors, the intracellular transduction pathway, the response behavior in saturating and nonlinear regimes, and the extrapolation of the fitted planar-geometry parameters to the living pistil. Subsequent literature (2012-2024) has resolved the identity questions: synergid-secreted AtLURE1 peptides and XIUQIU peptides are Arabidopsis attractants, and the tip-localized receptor kinase PRK6 and the MDIS1-MIK1/MIK2 receptor heteromer perceive AtLURE1. It has also established the first transduction link (PRK6-ROPGEF-ROP1) and delivered the first direct in-vivo imaging of guidance dynamics. The surviving open problem is the completion of this picture: the molecular steps connecting attractant perception to the tip-focused calcium gradient and to growth-rate control, the quantitative law governing turning versus attractant concentration and gradient steepness including saturation, and the validation of the guidance model in the geometry of the intact pistil and the in-vivo adaptive role of growth-rate slowing for competitive fertilization success.

Background

Flowering plants deliver immotile sperm to the ovule-enclosed female gametophyte through the polarized growth of the pollen tube, a tubular cell that extends from the pollen grain through the pistil's transmitting tract (the central tissue that channels tube growth toward the ovary) toward the ovule, where it enters a small opening called the micropyle and releases the sperm cells for double fertilization. Two cells of the female gametophyte, the synergids, which flank the egg cell, secrete small cysteine-rich attractant peptides. In the semi-in-vitro assay used by Stewman et al. (2010), ovules dissected from Arabidopsis thaliana are arranged around a cut style on artificial medium, so pollen tubes emerging from the style can be filmed as they are attracted across the medium toward individual ovules. Analyzing such images, that study found that attraction strengthens with the time ovules have incubated on the medium, that tubes sense the attractant gradient at 100-150 μ\mum from the ovule (farther than previously reported), and that tubes slow their growth near the micropyle of functional ovules. Their stochastic model assumed continuous, isotropic release of the attractant on the two-dimensional medium, a non-saturating (linear) receptor-binding regime, and a rule in which the tube compares the fraction of bound receptors across its tip and turns stochastically in response to this difference; the model implied that the observed slowing substantially improves targeting success. The authors explicitly flagged as unresolved: the molecular identity of the Arabidopsis attractant(s) and the pollen-tube receptors; the intracellular pathway (for example, how attractant binding modulates Rop-family small GTPases and the tip-focused cytosolic calcium gradient that drives polarized extension); possible concentration- and gradient-steepness-dependent nonlinearities such as receptor saturation, testable only with precisely controlled attractant gradients; the uncertain extrapolation of fitted parameters from the planar semi-in-vitro geometry to the geometry of the intact pistil, where each ovule is attached by its stalk (the funiculus) to the ovary's ovule-bearing tissue (the placenta) and the effective diffusion differs; and the untested adaptive role of growth-rate slowing. Later work transformed this landscape. In Torenia, LURE peptides were identified as synergid-secreted attractants (Okuda et al. 2009), and an arabinogalactan sugar chain, AMOR, was shown to confer on pollen tubes the competence to respond to ovular guidance cues (Mizukami et al. 2016). In Arabidopsis, a species-specific cluster of defensin-like genes was shown to encode the diffusible attractants AtLURE1, secreted from the synergids toward the micropyle (Takeuchi and Higashiyama 2012). The male side was then solved: the tip-localized leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinase PRK6 is an essential LURE1 receptor that interacts with RopGEFs (guanine-nucleotide-exchange factors that activate the Rho-of-plants GTPase ROP1) and accumulates asymmetrically toward an attractant source before the tube turns (Takeuchi and Higashiyama 2016), and the MDIS1-MIK1/MIK2 receptor heteromer also perceives LURE1 (Wang et al. 2016); structural work defined the recognition interface (Zhang et al. 2017). Genetic knockout of the entire AtLURE1 family, however, left fertility intact: AtLURE1s act as accelerators of pollen tube emergence that favor conspecific pollen in interspecific competition, while XIUQIU1-4 peptides attract tubes irrespective of species (Zhong et al. 2019), and AtLURE1/PRK6 signaling contributes to micropylar attraction in semi-in-vivo assays with complex epistasis on prk6 mutant pollen (Liu et al. 2021). Work on signal cessation addressed the post-arrival repulsive component: FERONIA-receptor-dependent pectin modification and nitric oxide production inactivate LUREs after arrival (Duan et al. 2020), and RALF peptide signaling enforces the polytubey block, preventing multiple tubes from entering one ovule (Zhong et al. 2022); synergid F-actin polarizes the secretion of AtLURE1 and XIUQIU (Susaki et al. 2023). Finally, two-photon deep imaging has for the first time visualized guidance inside the intact Arabidopsis pistil, measuring in-vivo growth rates (tubes decelerate to roughly 0.5 μ\mum/min in the hours before emergence from the transmitting tract), revealing an integument-dependent directional signal and spatially restricted funicular signaling, and dissecting several polytubey blocks (Mizuta et al. 2024). What this matured literature has not delivered is the molecular completion of the transduction chain from attractant perception to the tip-focused calcium gradient (for example, the calcium channel(s) acting downstream of ROP1), the receptors for the XIUQIU attractants, a quantitative characterization of the turning response as a function of attractant concentration and gradient steepness including the saturating regime that the 2010 model assumed away, and a parameterized validation of the gradient-guidance model in the geometry and diffusion environment of the living pistil.

Problem Statement

The problem, in the formulation left open by Stewman et al. (2010) and narrowed by subsequent resolution of the ligand and receptor identities, is to complete the mechanistic and quantitative account of how Arabidopsis ovule attractants steer pollen tubes: (1) identify the remaining molecular components of the transduction pathway from AtLURE1 (and XIUQIU) perception at the PRK6 and MDIS1-MIK receptor complexes, through ROPGEF-mediated activation of the ROP1 small GTPase, to the tip-focused cytosolic calcium gradient, polarized exocytosis, and the observed growth-rate modulation, including the calcium channel(s) acting downstream and the receptor(s) that perceive the XIUQIU attractants; (2) determine quantitatively how the probability and magnitude of pollen tube reorientation depend on attractant concentration and on gradient steepness across the tube tip, including the saturating and any nonlinear integration regimes that the original non-saturating receptor-binding model assumed away, and whether the receptor-occupancy-difference sensing rule of Stewman et al. holds for the identified ligand-receptor pairs; and (3) test whether the fitted guidance parameters (sensing range, effective attractant diffusion, slowing behavior) derived on planar semi-in-vitro medium extrapolate to the funiculus, placenta and septum (the ovary's interior dividing walls) geometry of the intact pistil, and whether growth-rate slowing measurably improves competitive fertilization success in vivo as the 2010 model predicted. These three demands are jointly required and jointly constitutive of the account: the problem is resolved only when all three are addressed, and no single demand, or proper subset of them, constitutes a solution.

References

  1. Stewman SF, Jones-Rhoades M, Bhimalapuram P, Tchernookov M, Preuss D, Dinner AR (2010). Mechanistic insights from a quantitative analysis of pollen tube guidance. BMC Plant Biology 10:32. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-32 (source paper)
  2. Okuda S, Tsutsui H, Shiina K, Sprunck S, Takeuchi H, Yui R, Kasahara RD, Hamamura Y, Mizukami A, Susaki D, Kawano N, Sakakibara T, Namiki S, Itoh K, Otsuka K, Matsuzaki M, Nozaki H, Kuroiwa T, Nakano A, Kanaoka MM, Dresselhaus T, Sasaki N, Higashiyama T (2009). Defensin-like polypeptide LUREs are pollen tube attractants secreted from synergid cells. Nature 458:357-361. DOI: 10.1038/nature07882. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07882
  3. Takeuchi H, Higashiyama T (2012). A species-specific cluster of defensin-like genes encodes diffusible pollen tube attractants in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biology 10:e1001449. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001449. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001449
  4. Wang T, Liang L, Xue Y, Jia PF, Chen W, Zhang MX, Wang YC, Li HJ, Yang WC (2016). A receptor heteromer mediates the male perception of female attractants in plants. Nature 531:241-244. DOI: 10.1038/nature16975. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16975
  5. Takeuchi H, Higashiyama T (2016). Tip-localized receptors control pollen tube growth and LURE sensing in Arabidopsis. Nature 531:245-248. DOI: 10.1038/nature17413. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17413
  6. Zhang X, Liu W, Nagae TT, Takeuchi H, Zhang H, Han Z, Higashiyama T, Chai J (2017). Structural basis for receptor recognition of pollen tube attraction peptides. Nature Communications 8:1331. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01323-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01323-8
  7. Mizukami AG, Inatsugi R, Jiao J, Kotake T, Kuwata K, Ootani K, Okuda S, Sankaranarayanan S, Sato Y, Maruyama D, Iwai H, Garenaux E, Sato C, Kitajima K, Tsumuraya Y, Mori H, Yamaguchi J, Itami K, Sasaki N, Higashiyama T (2016). The AMOR arabinogalactan sugar chain induces pollen-tube competency to respond to ovular guidance. Current Biology 26:1091-1097. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.040
  8. Zhong S, Liu M, Wang Z, Huang Q, Hou S, Xu YC, Ge Z, Song Z, Huang J, Qiu X, Shi Y, Xiao J, Liu P, Guo YL, Dong J, Dresselhaus T, Gu H, Qu LJ (2019). Cysteine-rich peptides promote interspecific genetic isolation in Arabidopsis. Science 364:eaau9564. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau9564. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau9564
  9. Duan Q, Liu MJ, Kita D, Jordan SS, Yeh FJ, Yvon R, Carpenter H, Federico AN, Garcia-Valencia LE, Eyles SJ, Wang CS, Wu HM, Cheung AY (2020). FERONIA controls pectin- and nitric oxide-mediated male-female interaction. Nature 579:561-566. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2106-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2106-2
  10. Liu M, Wang Z, Hou S, Wang L, Huang Q, Gu H, Dresselhaus T, Zhong S, Qu LJ (2021). AtLURE1/PRK6-mediated signaling promotes conspecific micropylar pollen tube guidance. Plant Physiology 186:865-873. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab105. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab105
  11. Takeuchi H (2021). The role of diverse LURE-type cysteine-rich peptides as signaling molecules in plant reproduction. Peptides 142:170572. DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2021.170572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2021.170572
  12. Zhong S, Li L, Wang Z, Ge Z, Li Q, Bleckmann A, Wang J, Song Z, Shi Y, Liu T, Li L, Zhou H, Wang Y, Zhang L, Wu HM, Lai L, Gu H, Dong J, Cheung AY, Dresselhaus T, Qu LJ (2022). RALF peptide signaling controls the polytubey block in Arabidopsis. Science 375:290-296. DOI: 10.1126/science.abl4683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl4683
  13. Susaki D, Izumi R, Oi T, Takeuchi H, Shin JM, Sugi N, Kinoshita T, Higashiyama T, Kawashima T, Maruyama D (2023). F-actin regulates the polarized secretion of pollen tube attractants in Arabidopsis synergid cells. The Plant Cell 35:1222-1240. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koac371. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac371
  14. Mizuta Y, Sakakibara D, Nagahara S, Kaneshiro I, Nagae TT, Kurihara D, Higashiyama T (2024). Deep imaging reveals dynamics and signaling in one-to-one pollen tube guidance. EMBO Reports 25:2529-2549. DOI: 10.1038/s44319-024-00151-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44319-024-00151-4
  15. Luo N, Yan A, Liu G, Guo J, Rong D, Kanaoka MM, Xiao Z, Xu G, Higashiyama T, Cui X, Yang Z (2017). Exocytosis-coordinated mechanisms for tip growth underlie pollen tube growth guidance. Nature Communications 8:1687. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01452-0. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01452-0
  16. Okuda S, Suzuki T, Kanaoka MM, Mori H, Sasaki N, Higashiyama T (2013). Acquisition of LURE-binding activity at the pollen tube tip of Torenia fournieri. Molecular Plant 6:1074-1090. DOI: 10.1093/mp/sst050. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sst050